[TheRealThing]

ARTICLE EXCERPT---
"In January, President Obama announced plans for new EPA mandates aimed at cutting methane emissions by nearly one-half over the next decade. Hence, the federal regulators are busily crafting and ordering new limits on emissions from cows and other gassy critters, manure piles, landfills, sewers, and motor vehicles, etc. But the main targets, of course, are the coal, oil, and natural-gas industries. Coal and oil, especially, have been in the crosshairs, while, until recently, natural gas was the darling of environmentalists, who promoted it as the “clean energy” alternative to its “dirty” hydrocarbon cousins. However, now that natural-gas production has taken off and is actually replacing significant amounts of coal and oil, its erstwhile champions have turned on it with a vengeance."
END EXCERPT---
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/envir...-289784321


Anybody who can't see the target for liberals is the eventual elimination of all fossil fuels usage, is plain old lying to themselves. According to the Gallup Poll President Obama's approval rating stands at 42.6%. Seriously, world affairs are in tatters, and our president has a cow fart mania? I mean, who are these 42% anyway? There couldn't be so much as a half an inch between their eyes. What he and his liberal marionettes haven't lied about, they've been wrong about. Any speculation out there about how we're going to go about cutting cow emissions in half? :please:

[Fly By Night]

Cows don't kill the planet. People kill the planet.

[Granny Bear]

It includes elephant farts, too.....an endangered species. How will the liberals decide such a complicated issue as global warming versus methane expulsion???

On a more serious note, I read on Fox News' website where Obama is considering helping Iran in a nuclear armament program in order to solicit their aid in fighting ISIS. Obama was supposed to have received a letter back in 2009.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/02/14/...port-says/

I was sure I had misunderstood the article, and I've tried to find it on other news platforms, but no luck...

Any suggestions??

[TheRealThing]

It includes elephant farts, too.....an endangered species. How will the liberals decide such a complicated issue as global warming versus methane expulsion???

On a more serious note, I read on Fox News' website where Obama is considering helping Iran in a nuclear armament program in order to solicit their aid in fighting ISIS. Obama was supposed to have received a letter back in 2009.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/02/14/...port-says/

I was sure I had misunderstood the article, and I've tried to find it on other news platforms, but no luck...

Any suggestions??

I've heard the subject mentioned in several interviews with retired generals. Obama and his legion of bozos think America can win over, if not the affections then at least the gratitude of the Ayatollah, if we help Iran become nuclear. Now if you ask me, that's akin to strapping a mini-gun on James Holmes and sending him into a crowded movie theater but, that is the thinking of your liberal leaders.

If I can find something on it I'll let you know. In the meantime, it just goes to show how asinine and petty government becomes when it falls into the hands of liberals. You might not remember but I posted about a similar situation that happened back during the prewar FDR era. As I recall, liberal micro managers were trying to intrude into every facet of life, including commerce. In that day vendors would sell crates of 10 chickens and the size of each chicken became the interest of New Deal bureaucrats in the FDR administration. After much bru ha-ha, the matter incredibly came before the SCOTUS. Chief Justice Hughes actually laughed at FDR for his pettiness as he ruled against governmental intrusion into the marketplace. There were enough lucid minded men around in those days to deny liberals the foothold they craved.

[TheRealThing]

It includes elephant farts, too.....an endangered species. How will the liberals decide such a complicated issue as global warming versus methane expulsion???

On a more serious note, I read on Fox News' website where Obama is considering helping Iran in a nuclear armament program in order to solicit their aid in fighting ISIS. Obama was supposed to have received a letter back in 2009.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/02/14/...port-says/

I was sure I had misunderstood the article, and I've tried to find it on other news platforms, but no luck...

Any suggestions??

Try these Granny Bear. http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/ne...ement.html

http://bangordailynews.com/2015/02/13/ne...reInnation

http://bangordailynews.com/2015/02/13/ne...reInnation

[tvtimeout]

I don't know about killing the planet but they are killing my wallet

[Hoot Gibson]

^Don't blame innocent cows for killing your wallet. Thank a liberal.

[Memo Luna]

Is that what they call Michelle Obama now? The cow?

[TheRealThing]

Is that what they call Michelle Obama now? The cow?

I don't know about that, but I did hear that some white house secret service guys got into trouble for calling out her ample posterior, LOL. And, of course there is Harry Rex who has noted her likeness to Chewbacca. But, if gas is the problem, we should be running everything her husband says through an industrial grade air scrubber. How long has it really been since he has actually gotten something right involving either domestic or foreign policy?

Just one case in point from among the many, that being the famous ISIS jv squad (Obama's label). Which, according to Leon Panetta's stated position over this past weekend, is presently the greatest threat the United States faces. And here we thought it was cow farts. Of course, Panetta's thinking doesn't mesh well with the rationale espoused by the second generational "Imagine" thinkers surrounding our President so, obviously they will reject that notion. No, Ivy Leaguer novices making the strategic decisions today believe that large scale war is a relic of 20th century thinking, and that they are called by history to lead all mankind into the dawning brotherhood of man.

To expand just a bit on the dream world as "Imagined" in the eye of the liberal and as described by John Lennon. I heard two notable men only this morning speaking about the gridlock in DC, Dr Ben Carson and (ret) Vice Chief of Staff US Army General Jack Keane. Both alluded to the political food fight that erupts at every juncture in the Congress between the Dems and the Republicans. On it's face, their assessments are true, however, though the politicians involved do in fact bear the D or R label, the real adversary IMHO, are the liberals seeded mainly within the ranks of the Dems but, admittedly to some lesser degree among the Republicans in both houses of government. They are the ones who appear to be willing to steer the US ship of state into uncharted waters, or run her aground trying. I believe that the people have forgotten or just plain overlooked the significance of a US President saying that he was about to fundamentally change the face of America. Reinventing society under the new social paradigm if you will, by the incessant parroting of party talking points.

[Granny Bear]

Well, the good news is that I didn't misunderstand the article. Not enough room to list the bad news!!

Wow..just wow!

[Harry Rex Vonner]

I did not mean to slight Chewbacca in any way. He is a patriot. It is not his fault that Michelle looks like him.

[Hoot Gibson]

When I think of "Moochelle," I see a mega-moocher, not a cow. There is no reason to suspect that American cows hate this country. Most cows just want to be left alone - free to choose and eat whatever they want to eat.

But that is what is great about Moochelle Obama. You can think of her as "Moo-chelle" or as "Mooch-elle," and make a good case either way. I just prefer not to insult innocent cows by associating them with such a loathsome, seflish, hypocritical, racist, authoritarian human being.

[Granny Bear]

Obama may have dropped the ball with aiding Iran to becoming nuclear, but he has an answer to ISIS. We are going to give them all jobs!!!

Why didn't I think of that??

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/...r-to-isis/

[Hoot Gibson]

Obama may have dropped the ball with aiding Iran to becoming nuclear, but he has an answer to ISIS. We are going to give them all jobs!!!

Why didn't I think of that??

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/...r-to-isis/

Maybe we could hire them to blow up all of the abandoned buildings in Detroit. When they're finished with that job, then Obama could call in the drones and take credit for my idea of combining urban renewal, a youth jobs program, and a humanitarian action that would allow thousands of youths to live their dream of becoming martyrs.

[Granny Bear]

This woman is certifiable!!

Hands down!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/...o-nuanced/

[TheRealThing]

This woman is certifiable!!

Hands down!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/...o-nuanced/

Obama came into office making promises to everybody. Therefore, his state department floating the notion of offering terrorists a job isn't really that far fetched if you ask me. This ISIS deal is certainly no quest by the unemployed to find a job. But make no mistake, to the liberal, the blame for everything from domestic violence to global terrorism to the fictitious absurdity known as global warming, may be laid at the feet of rich people who don't care about the poor.

In support of my opinion consider what we're doing with Iran these days. Instead of taking things away or military threat, we're giving them things. My conclusion---- if Obama had been president when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, we would have given them a generous aid package and offered to do much more.

[TheRealThing]

BTW Granny Bear, great link. Did you listen on to hear O'Reilly's talking points memo? It's worth hearing.

[Granny Bear]

Oh, yes I already did that!! Plus I found a couple more.

[Spirit100]

In response to the initial title of this thread....I need to get more busy on eating more cow.

nicker: