[TheRealVille]

So its cool for the government to confiscate private property based off of an arbitrary definition? Remember these "assault weapons" are used in less than 1% of gun crimes. More kids will drown in swimming pools this year than will die by an ar-15. But you are cool with them taking peoples property because they made a definition of a weapon they wanted banned after these folks realized there handgun ban wasn't going anywhere? But of course liberals forget that little inconvenient truth of how all of this "assault weapons" horseshit came into existence. After handgun control inc realized that there was no shot of getting what they wanted (a ban on handguns) they changed their name and made up the definition of what we now call an "assault weapon" in an attempt to get a foot in the door towards more gun control. But hey im sure as a responsible gun owner you don't own one single handgun do you? Remember those are what are used in the vast majority of murders, not "assault weapons". All I want TRV is an honest explanation of why you think it is ok for a US senator to suggest confiscation of peoples personal property.

Where did I say it was ok?