[TheRealThing]

Yet, when I, and now WC23, post proof of Bush's lies, you completely ignore the proof, and start your bashing.

After actually having read the report, in lieu of a Mother Jones outtake or similar liberal drivel, I saw nothing to indicate the charges leveled by Jay Rockefeller were substantiated by any evidence. There is no question that those charges are embarrassingly offensive, especially in light of the fact that they are completely unsubstantiated. The SIC quotes you posted were damage control efforts by yet another democrat that is willing to put party ahead of country. There was no bipartisan agreement on Mr Rockefeller's allegations. The minority opinion clearly ran opposite to Rockefeller's claims and therefore the report is not a bipartisan 'finding'. In this case the Chairman abruptly changed course to pursue other possibilities. Why would he do that if there were anything to his statements charging Mr Bush with leading America to war under false pretense?

Like was said. The sensational nature of those statements got the dems the headlines they were looking for. Forget the fact there was nothing in the trail of evidence which would have led them to that kind of a conclusion.