[Harry Rex Vonner]

Julius Epstein says she didn't waive her right by making a statement. He said the only thing that would waive her right was answering a question then pleading the fifth. He called Trey Dowdy "amateur hourish" in not knowing the difference in making an opening statement(legal, according to him), and answering one question(not legal, according to him), then invoking her right. Not my knowledge, just what I'm reading.


Another point being brought up is that in 1959 the IRS changed congressional law wording on 501c4's, on their own, from exclusively to primarily. It looks like after it's all ironed out something good will come out of this mess. No one will get tax free status, if they use it for political purposes, as soon as the wording of the law, that congress never changed, get's put back like it was originally worded. Below is apparently what the IRS changed the original wording to, on their own.


1959 IRS edit:



Original, and current 1913 congressional text:

I mean no offense but Julian Epstein is a well placed liberal Democrat operative. He often appears as the liberal voice on news programs where both sides are represented. Check it out. Quoting Epstein as an expert without an agenda is like me quoting Ann Coulter. As you will notice, I never do so. I know there are rampant partisans presenting themselves as "experts" on both sides. Unfortunately, they are rarely indentified as such.