[TheRealThing]

Here's what the bozo you mentioned wrote;

"In America, even sincere and long-hold religious beliefs do not trump the constitutional rights of those who happen to have been out-voted," U.S. District court Judge John G. Heyburn II wrote in the ruling, which concluded that the state's ban violated the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause."

So, going by this logic, if the results of some particular elections don't suit them, and to facilitate the tenets of social justice as they see fit, liberal judges can disallow the very elective process on which this nation is built. And, if we're going to broadly define such things as equal protection, please explain to me why bank robbers would not be covered under the equal protection clause? Matter of fact, how can we prosecute any kind of immoral act? Do not these folks have the same rights the rest of us have, and therefore, are they not being discriminated against? After all, we are guaranteed the right to pursue happiness and obviously acts of murder, rape, robbery, assault, drug and alcohol abuse, tax evasion, human trafficking, prostitution and you name it makes some folks happy, right?

There is no way things can get any more ridiculous, we have to vote these mentally deranged liberals out of office, if America is to survive.