[TheRealThing]

But, to answer the original question, if you want a senator from Kentucky who actually has the ability to make a difference, and have a voice in DC, then McConnell is clearly the choice to go. This is especially true in a year when, as many have predicted, the republicans are going to win control over the Senate making McConnell the Senate Majority Leader. This could have tremendous benefits for the state of Kentucky, as legislation featuring KY will frequently be brought to the floor. Conversely, if Grimes is elected, and the predictions are correct and the Republicans take control of the Senate, not only will Grimes be the least qualified democratic senator, but she will also be in the minority party, rendering her to be essentially worthless as a politician.

I understand the some may not agree with McConnell's political views on certain issues, but as a citizen of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the only logical choice to promote the betterment of the state is to put McConnell back in office.

Right on all counts. And frankly, I can't believe some folks are struggling with accepting McConnell as majority leader after suffering through SanFranNan [borrowed from Seger] running the House, (and ObamaCare down our throats). And Harry Reid turning the World's most renowned governmental institution, that being the US Senate, into the circus of dysfunction and chaos that we see today. The reputation of the US as a bona-fide superpower has suffered mightily in the eyes of the world thanks to these two rabid chipmunks.