[TheRealThing]

Now, 64SUR, I am neither a fake scientist, nor a brain-damaged, witless dolt booted off so many sites I hopelessly landed on BGR. I basically am not a huge fan of textualism as a be all, end all way of utilizing the United States Constitution. I am a respecter of Justice Scalia as a brilliant mind and jurist, though I disagreed with him a lot. "Hoot Gibson" makes a lot of assumptions. I respect the Constitution, and the wealthy white men who wrote it, but I don't worship either as perfect. That's about it.

So, you're saying there is something better than a clear understanding of what was written, to determine the meaning of what was written?