[ronald_reagan]

Believing it to be a free exercise of conscience, the anti-smoking advocate does not argue for the criminalization of smoking; however, believing it be a detrimental choice, the advocate works to reduce smoking numbers. There is no paradox there, unless one's mind cannot wrap around multi-layered and faceted issues.

Anti smoking advocates DO argue for criminalization of it...

There's several states considering banning it within the entire boundaries of jurisdiction?

I'm for criminalization of it myself, as long as medicare still covers the costs associated.

Where are you going with this?