[BlackcatAlum]

Then I would take Syracuses dominating performance against UNC @ UNC. Syracuse completely dominated a mediocre team on their home court with all the lights and cameras as one of the first showdowns of the college season. They beat a UNC team by 16 at UNC and the game wasn't even that close. This is the same UNC team that lost to UK by 2 at UK. So, who and where does make a difference????

My point is, you just don't choose when you play your best. It just happens and things click, not matter who the competition is.

Also, UK beat UNC by 2 in a game where John Wall was dominating and went down with cramps late in the 1st half or early in the 2nd and UNC made a comeback. Since then, Bledsoe, Dodson, Liggins, etc. have all matured a lot and have made UK a lot better.

Also, the only reason why I'm saying UK is overall a better team than Syracuse, Kansas, etc. is because we have overall more talent and depth than either of these teams. I'm not saying UK would beat either team 10 times out of 10 games, but Kentucky would be favored if these teams meet up in the NCAA tournament.