[Harry Rex Vonner]

Testifying before a congressional committee isn't the same as a trial. All the legal analysts and lawyers, I've watched all day long agree, she was completely allowed to do exactly what she did. She wasn't on trial. Top people on the committee agreed. The one guy, Trey, didn't have a clue on the difference in committee hearings and trials, according to analysts. From the evidence, it looks like you don't have a clue either.



Like his post, Chester. When are you getting out of law school?

Your level of ignorance seems to increase with each post.

The "guy", Trey, whom you seem to think didn't have a clue is a former federal prosecutor. His legal credentials far exceed those of anyone else on the committee. Trey Gowdy was, most likely, the only person there, including the highly disappointing Issa, who knew how the hearing should have been handled.

As for the "analysts" you heard all day, I will assume you were watching MSNBC or a similar venue. We can all take judicial notice (a legal term) of their lack of knowledge of the process. The "top people" on the committee, whom you seem to have confidence in, were your fellow obstructionist Democrats.

And, as for the witness leaving, she only did so when she was excused by Issa. She was going nowhere until he gave her permission. Wherein lies my problem. Issa should have forced her, and he could absolutely have done so, to answer question after question with her Fifth Amendment statement.

Now, I don't know if your ignorance is strictly personal or if you got it from watching too many biased liberals on your favorite television venues.

In either case, you are wrong and they are wrong. I don't try to tell you how to fit pipe. Don't remotely infer that you can correct me on anything in the legal arena.