1. Bluegrassrivals
  2. Off Topic
  3. Classic BlueGrassRivals
  4. Ripkin or PLL...why not both?


  Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ripkin or PLL...why not both?
The Guru Offline
Head Coach
******
VIP Usergroup
Posts: 3,361
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#20
02-21-2006, 03:12 AM
"Eagle Pride 90`" Wrote:I doubt this is true. I have been to every Cal Ripken meeting and it has always been said it will not be held against anyone who stays at PLL. That being said I am sure the JCMS and JCHS coaches would encourage those kids in the 13-15 division to play middle school ball because their seasons coinside. The junior league played four games last year before all-stars, so what happens to those kids who don't make all-stars? PLL hangs it's hat on it's all-star play and they have alot to be proud of but the new league will be great for the 13-15 division. If your son will not have it held against him for playing Babe Ruth why not bring him over? I'm sure he will be welcomed with open arms. If everyone did this they could keep that team together and play alot more baseball. Do you think it would be harder to win a state tournament in the babe ruth division. I hear alot of people saying this was a political move and I'm sure politics played it's part,but if polotics isn't played both ways why aren't more paintsville kids signing up for this new league. The new league has more money, and has no problem keeping up with it. the facilities at PLL have went to pot the last two years and the only reason you will see upgrades is the threat of this new league. So if nothing else the parents of PLL should thank the Cal Ripken league for helping get their program back in shape. PLL is full of good hard working parents and I hope it flourishes.
First.....PLL will be going thru some upgrades this year and it is not because of Cal Ripken, they will be hosting the 11-12 year old state this year!!!
The first few years I do think Babe Ruth will struggle.
As to why more are not signing up...I guess you are talking about kids that attend Paintsville. If so, it is probably because Cal Ripken has been concentrating on the County kids. They have never been to any Paintsville games holding signups. BTW...PLL is off to their best start in years in signups so far.
If my son tells me he wants to play Babe Ruth, He will be there, I promise!!!
Find Share
 Next Oldest | Next Newest 
  Thread Closed
Messages In This Thread
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 03:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-20-2006, 08:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-20-2006, 08:43 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by corndog23 - 02-20-2006, 09:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-20-2006, 09:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-20-2006, 09:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 11:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-20-2006, 11:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 12:20 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:18 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-21-2006, 01:25 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:48 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:51 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 02:53 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:55 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:22 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:34 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Fuzzy5118 - 02-21-2006, 03:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-21-2006, 10:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 10:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 12:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 01:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 02:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 02:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 03:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 03:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 07:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-21-2006, 08:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 12:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 03:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-22-2006, 10:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JOHNBOY1956 - 02-22-2006, 01:45 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by tigerman2163 - 02-22-2006, 03:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-22-2006, 05:33 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-22-2006, 05:35 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by rockhouse - 02-26-2006, 12:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Old School - 02-26-2006, 01:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 02:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-26-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 10:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-27-2006, 12:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:29 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 01:06 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 01:24 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-27-2006, 10:46 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-27-2006, 03:07 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 03:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-27-2006, 03:55 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 02-27-2006, 03:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-27-2006, 06:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 11:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-28-2006, 06:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-28-2006, 04:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 11:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 02:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 02:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 05:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-21-2006, 06:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-22-2006, 12:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-22-2006, 11:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-22-2006, 01:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 12:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-23-2006, 12:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 01:38 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 11:28 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:16 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:57 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:05 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 04:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 01:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 04:01 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 05:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:08 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 12:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 04:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 05:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 01:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 09:54 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:50 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:52 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-28-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 01:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 01:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 02:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 03-28-2006, 03:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 04:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 04:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 06:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 11:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-29-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by 2000PHS - 03-29-2006, 01:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-01-2006, 09:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-02-2006, 01:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 06:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 07:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 10:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-02-2006, 11:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-03-2006, 09:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-04-2006, 10:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 10:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-05-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-05-2006, 11:07 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 03:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-05-2006, 04:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 05:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-05-2006, 11:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-05-2006, 11:36 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-05-2006, 11:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cardsfan - 04-06-2006, 12:59 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-06-2006, 09:43 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:20 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:28 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-14-2006, 10:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-14-2006, 11:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-14-2006, 10:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by airball3 - 04-14-2006, 11:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-15-2006, 12:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-17-2006, 02:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 09:23 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:04 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:37 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 12:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 12:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 05:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-17-2006, 05:54 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-17-2006, 08:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-17-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 11:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-17-2006, 11:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:40 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 06:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-18-2006, 08:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 08:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:01 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:05 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 09:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-18-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 03:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-19-2006, 11:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-20-2006, 11:05 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)