1. Bluegrassrivals
  2. Off Topic
  3. Classic BlueGrassRivals
  4. Ripkin or PLL...why not both?


  Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ripkin or PLL...why not both?
The Guru Offline
Head Coach
******
VIP Usergroup
Posts: 3,361
Threads: 71
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#71
02-27-2006, 12:29 AM
"ChillyWilly" Wrote:No disrespect meant by the term Paintsville folk. It is just that by the posts in this thread Paintsville school supporters are the ones that appear to be expressing the most dislike for the new league. Correct me if I have read some of this wrong. These posts are all I have to go by in this whole conversation. But I still stand by the statements regarding the quality of play as a whole statewide.
It is not only Paintsville School people, I am not against the Cal League, and am going out on a limb and say that I never really thought that Paintsville LL ever tried to pit School against school. Yes some people have, but not the league. Heck.... There was just about as many coaches and board members that had kids going to County as there were City last year. So...I guess it was just something else!! Maybe some didn't like the Prez.... heck everyone knows he and I have had tremendous differences before!! Maybe it is just time for a new league...I don't know, and doubt if anyone else does either!
Find Share
 Next Oldest | Next Newest 
  Thread Closed
Messages In This Thread
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 03:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-20-2006, 08:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-20-2006, 08:43 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by corndog23 - 02-20-2006, 09:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-20-2006, 09:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-20-2006, 09:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 11:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-20-2006, 11:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 12:20 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:18 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-21-2006, 01:25 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:48 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:51 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 02:53 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:55 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:22 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:34 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Fuzzy5118 - 02-21-2006, 03:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-21-2006, 10:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 10:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 12:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 01:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 02:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 02:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 03:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 03:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 07:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-21-2006, 08:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 12:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 03:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-22-2006, 10:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JOHNBOY1956 - 02-22-2006, 01:45 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by tigerman2163 - 02-22-2006, 03:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-22-2006, 05:33 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-22-2006, 05:35 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by rockhouse - 02-26-2006, 12:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Old School - 02-26-2006, 01:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 02:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-26-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 10:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-27-2006, 12:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:29 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 01:06 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 01:24 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-27-2006, 10:46 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-27-2006, 03:07 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 03:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-27-2006, 03:55 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 02-27-2006, 03:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-27-2006, 06:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 11:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-28-2006, 06:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-28-2006, 04:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 11:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 02:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 02:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 05:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-21-2006, 06:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-22-2006, 12:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-22-2006, 11:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-22-2006, 01:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 12:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-23-2006, 12:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 01:38 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 11:28 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:16 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:57 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:05 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 04:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 01:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 04:01 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 05:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:08 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 12:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 04:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 05:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 01:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 09:54 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:50 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:52 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-28-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 01:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 01:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 02:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 03-28-2006, 03:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 04:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 04:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 06:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 11:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-29-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by 2000PHS - 03-29-2006, 01:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-01-2006, 09:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-02-2006, 01:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 06:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 07:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 10:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-02-2006, 11:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-03-2006, 09:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-04-2006, 10:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 10:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-05-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-05-2006, 11:07 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 03:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-05-2006, 04:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 05:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-05-2006, 11:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-05-2006, 11:36 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-05-2006, 11:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cardsfan - 04-06-2006, 12:59 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-06-2006, 09:43 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:20 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:28 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-14-2006, 10:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-14-2006, 11:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-14-2006, 10:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by airball3 - 04-14-2006, 11:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-15-2006, 12:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-17-2006, 02:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 09:23 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:04 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:37 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 12:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 12:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 05:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-17-2006, 05:54 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-17-2006, 08:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-17-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 11:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-17-2006, 11:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:40 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 06:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-18-2006, 08:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 08:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:01 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:05 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 09:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-18-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 03:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-19-2006, 11:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-20-2006, 11:05 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)