1. Bluegrassrivals
  2. Off Topic
  3. Classic BlueGrassRivals
  4. Ripkin or PLL...why not both?


  Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ripkin or PLL...why not both?
Ridge Runner Offline
Cheerleader
***
Posts: 424
Threads: 13
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
#192
04-18-2006, 06:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by bigcountry
If this is in fact tax dollars paying for any of this, then whoever is spending them should be applauded for what they are doing. It's about time that our tax dollars are spent to the benefit of something ( particularly kids), rather than pouring them down a crawdad hole. I think I would much rather see 600 of our kids playing baseball than playing Xbox or running the roads , trying to find some kind of trouble to get into cruising the plaza, wouldn't you?

What a tormented soul you are showing yourself to be. There seems to be over 600 happy kids playing ball right now, and all your interested in doing is finding a fault in someone or something that is trying to make the community a better place. I saw about 3,000 people enjoying the festivities friday night. Yeah, it really looked they were a miserable , unhappy bunch.Rolleyes Get a life.

No one is saying it is wrong to spend tax dollars for the benifit of the county kids. BUT, the tax tax dollars that are in question are supposed to be spent towards the education of these kids, NOT, to spend it on a new youth baseball complex. Which also makes people (tax payers) ask why? Didn't we already have a youth baseball league, with three nice fields and has been around for over 50 years? If people are so worried about developing young boys and girls. Then why not use their energy to help bring these kids into the league that has already been there and is well know?
It is not just the "Tiger Family" that is upset. It is also a lot from the Eagle Nest that are upset with the situation also.
One of the main things that makes al lot of people stop and question is the perception that is given when this league was formed. From my understanding the leagues board consist of all the County Principals and a couple Vice Principals. ALL, Except Paintsville's two. I just fail to understand why split something that has done so well in the past? If people didn't like the way things were being run all they had to do was change it.
But, we could beat on this until we are dead and gone. Just let the kids play ball and enjoy themselves while they can.

Quote: Originally Posted by Golden Eagle
It's all about numbers and the last time I looked there's a big difference and that's why you and the rest of the big blue tiger lovers keep stirring this subject up.


Just for your info this thread was started by a county parent.
Find Share
 Next Oldest | Next Newest 
  Thread Closed
Messages In This Thread
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 03:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-20-2006, 08:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-20-2006, 08:43 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by corndog23 - 02-20-2006, 09:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-20-2006, 09:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-20-2006, 09:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jeter2 - 02-20-2006, 11:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-20-2006, 11:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 12:20 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:18 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-21-2006, 01:25 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-21-2006, 01:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:48 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:51 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 02:53 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 02:55 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:15 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:22 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 03:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 03:34 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Fuzzy5118 - 02-21-2006, 03:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-21-2006, 10:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-21-2006, 10:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 12:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 01:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 01:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by SnakE - 02-21-2006, 02:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 02:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 02:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-21-2006, 03:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-21-2006, 03:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 02-21-2006, 07:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-21-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-21-2006, 08:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 12:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 03:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 02-22-2006, 10:12 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JOHNBOY1956 - 02-22-2006, 01:45 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by tigerman2163 - 02-22-2006, 03:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-22-2006, 05:33 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-22-2006, 05:35 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 07:25 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-22-2006, 10:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 02-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by rockhouse - 02-26-2006, 12:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by JMac - 02-26-2006, 12:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Old School - 02-26-2006, 01:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 02:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-26-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 02-26-2006, 10:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:09 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by ChillyWilly - 02-27-2006, 12:14 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 12:29 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 01:06 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 02-27-2006, 01:24 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by OnTheMove - 02-27-2006, 10:46 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 02-27-2006, 03:07 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 03:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-27-2006, 03:55 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 02-27-2006, 03:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by WOW - 02-27-2006, 06:19 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by hacyco - 02-27-2006, 08:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 02-27-2006, 11:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by halfstep - 02-28-2006, 06:35 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by shelf - 02-28-2006, 04:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 11:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 02:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 02:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Dolphinsfan - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-15-2006, 05:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-21-2006, 06:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-22-2006, 12:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-22-2006, 11:30 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-22-2006, 01:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 12:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-23-2006, 12:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 01:38 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 11:28 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:16 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 03:57 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:05 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-23-2006, 04:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle03/06 - 03-23-2006, 04:24 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 01:42 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:02 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-24-2006, 02:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 04:01 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-24-2006, 05:41 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 03-24-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:08 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-25-2006, 01:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 12:22 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Whos next? - 03-27-2006, 04:32 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 05:08 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:51 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-27-2006, 11:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 01:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 09:54 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:50 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 11:52 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 03-28-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-28-2006, 01:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 01:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 02:13 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 03-28-2006, 03:31 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 04:04 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 03-28-2006, 04:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 03-28-2006, 06:09 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 10:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cheif - 03-28-2006, 11:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by brotherinarms - 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 03-29-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by 2000PHS - 03-29-2006, 01:39 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-01-2006, 09:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-02-2006, 01:48 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 06:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 07:03 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-02-2006, 07:56 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-02-2006, 10:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-02-2006, 11:47 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-03-2006, 09:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-04-2006, 10:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:18 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-04-2006, 11:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 10:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-05-2006, 10:47 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-05-2006, 11:07 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 03:00 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-05-2006, 04:58 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-05-2006, 05:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-05-2006, 11:02 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Envy~Me~Always - 04-05-2006, 11:36 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Pupaw - 04-05-2006, 11:49 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by cardsfan - 04-06-2006, 12:59 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-06-2006, 09:43 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:20 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:28 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle Eye - 04-08-2006, 12:34 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-14-2006, 10:27 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by darth807 - 04-14-2006, 11:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-14-2006, 10:21 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by airball3 - 04-14-2006, 11:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-15-2006, 12:38 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-17-2006, 02:10 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:26 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 09:23 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:04 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 10:19 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-17-2006, 10:37 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 12:06 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 12:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-17-2006, 05:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-17-2006, 05:54 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by IISnakE - 04-17-2006, 08:46 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-17-2006, 08:59 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by THOMCAT - 04-17-2006, 09:29 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Gatortater - 04-17-2006, 11:42 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by jchsrulz - 04-17-2006, 11:52 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:40 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 12:58 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 06:31 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by blackwidow - 04-18-2006, 08:03 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 08:57 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:01 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Golden Eagle - 04-18-2006, 09:05 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by bigcountry - 04-18-2006, 09:17 AM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-18-2006, 12:10 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:23 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by The Guru - 04-18-2006, 01:30 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Ridge Runner - 04-18-2006, 03:26 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by In the Know - 04-19-2006, 11:17 PM
Ripkin or PLL...why not both? - by Eagle89 - 04-20-2006, 11:05 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)