Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Republican Gingrich out of Virginia primary election
#61
TheRealVille Wrote:Neither do I. I do take personal slams personal, though.
:biglmao
#62
TheRealVille Wrote:Newt is so out of touch, even your mother ship has turned on him.
Are any of the candidates in touch with the average working class American? They live and work in a bubble and are feed what their handlers feed them. As far as people turning on him he's just the candidate du jour. As the front runner he gets the spotlight and sometimes it gets hot. Should really ask yourself why is the media ignoring Romney? Most comments geared toward him are just in passing, who do you thing the fourth estate wants the GOP to run in November?
#63
:biglmao: The truth will set you free. You treat every criticism of liberalism, Obama, and union thuggery as a personal attack.
#64
I think nearly 100% percent of the people on here agree that it was much more peaceful at BGR while you were on vacation from here, Hoot. Maybe you should go crawl back into your hole, and make the world a better place.
#65
TheRealVille Wrote:I think nearly 100% percent of the people on here agree that it was much more peaceful at BGR while you were on vacation from here, Hoot. Maybe you should go crawl back into your hole, and make the world a better place.
Spoken like a true liberal. If you don't want to debate someone, you hope they disappear.
#66
nky Wrote:Are any of the candidates in touch with the average working class American? They live and work in a bubble and are feed what their handlers feed them. As far as people turning on him he's just the candidate du jour. As the front runner he gets the spotlight and sometimes it gets hot. Should really ask yourself why is the media ignoring Romney? Most comments geared toward him are just in passing, who do you thing the fourth estate wants the GOP to run in November?
You are exactly right, nky. The media supports the most liberal candidates who are capable of winning the nomination. Huntsman is not electable, so Romney is the GOP candidate of choice and wins their kid glove treatment until the general campaign. He is this year's John McCain but actually has a shot at winning in 2012.
#67
SKINNYPIG Wrote:Spoken like a true liberal. If you don't want to debate someone, you hope they disappear.
Did you go to the same school as Hoot? This isn't a debate. The article states a truth, which isn't debatable.
#68
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You are exactly right, nky. The media supports the most liberal candidates who are capable of winning the nomination. Huntsman is not electable, so Romney is the GOP candidate of choice and wins their kid glove treatment until the general campaign. He is this year's John McCain but actually has a shot at winning in 2012.
John McCain had a shot, up until the minute he added that idiot to his ticket.
#69
TheRealVille Wrote:Did you go to the same school as Hoot? This isn't a debate. The article states a truth, which isn't debatable.
No, but your post did not reference to this thread. You said it was more peaceful on BGP. Admit it, you fear Hoot so you want him gone.
#70
SKINNYPIG Wrote:No, but your post did not reference to this thread. You said it was more peaceful on BGP. Admit it, you fear Hoot so you want him gone.
:biglmao: What's to fear? If he's the best you all got, you're screwed. You were here while he was gone, was it more peaceful? Did I state a lie?
#71
SKINNYPIG Wrote:No, but your post did not reference to this thread. You said it was more peaceful on BGP. Admit it, you fear Hoot so you want him gone.
It goes beyond that. RV actually offered to buy this website so that he could personally ban me for life. True story, and a hilarious one at that.
#72
TheRealVille Wrote::biglmao: What's to fear? If he's the best you all got, you're screwed. You were here while he was gone, was it more peaceful? Did I state a lie?
I don't think this forum is meant to be peaceful. It was becoming quite a bore though.
#73
Hoot Gibson Wrote:It goes beyond that. RV actually offered to buy this website so that he could personally ban me for life. True story, and a hilarious one at that.

Obviously intended as a joke though. Might have been some truth there though :popcorn:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#74
Hoot Gibson Wrote:In case you Einstein(s) missed it, I am not a Newt supporter except for the fact that I will support anybody who the GOP runs against Obama. Unlike you guy(s), I do not take attacks on politicians personally. I always feel like I am voting for the lesser of two evils in national elections, and anybody and everybody running for president in 2012 will be less of an evil than Obama.
Even though you insinuate that I post from multiple accounts, you very well know that I don't. It doesn't take two people to show that you are ignorant, you do a good job of that yourself. Any moderator you ask can prove it, with a simple DNS lookup. Mods, feel free to prove to Hooter that vector and I are not one in the same.
#75
TheRealVille Wrote:Even though you insinuate that I post from multiple accounts, you very well know that I don't. It doesn't take two people to show that you are ignorant, you do a good job of that yourself. Any moderator you ask can prove it, with a simple DNS lookup. Mods, feel free to prove to Hooter that vector and I are not one in the same.
You are a funny guy - calling me ignorant while demonstrating your ignorance of network terminology. Maybe you should ask some smart person why a "simple DNS lookup" is useless in determining whether a computer literate poster is patting themselves on the back with a clone account.

All I know is that when you are getting hammered in a debate (not an infrequent event), vector shows up with his personal attacks. Maybe you just have a secret admirer who only posts when you wade in over your head. Whatever the case, vector's debating skills are even weaker than your own.
#76
Tell me one thing I posted in this thread is untrue
#77
vector Wrote:Tell me one thing I posted in this thread is untrue
Bill Clinton was impeached and tried for perjery and impeachment not for having an affair with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton lied in the presence of a federal judge while under oath. Look it up. It was in all the papers.
#78
I know they tryed to impeach slick Willie
But what's that got to do with anything I
Posted in this thread
#79
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You are a funny guy - calling me ignorant while demonstrating your ignorance of network terminology. Maybe you should ask some smart person why a "simple DNS lookup" is useless in determining whether a computer literate poster is patting themselves on the back with a clone account.

All I know is that when you are getting hammered in a debate (not an infrequent event), vector shows up with his personal attacks. Maybe you just have a secret admirer who only posts when you wade in over your head. Whatever the case, vector's debating skills are even weaker than your own.
Whatever the terminology, you can be assured that vector and I aren't the same person. Whatever you want to call it, ask a mod if we are the same person. Until you do such, don't insinuate that we are the same person.
#80
Until you figure out that you and your ilk are a minority in this country, as far as politics go Hoot, you will have a sad little life. The majority of this country don't want your "far right wing" type to have much control over the country.
#81
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You are a funny guy - calling me ignorant while demonstrating your ignorance of network terminology. Maybe you should ask some smart person why a "simple DNS lookup" is useless in determining whether a computer literate poster is patting themselves on the back with a clone account.

All I know is that when you are getting hammered in a debate (not an infrequent event), vector shows up with his personal attacks. Maybe you just have a secret admirer who only posts when you wade in over your head. Whatever the case, vector's debating skills are even weaker than your own.
Again, I'm not getting hammered in a debate. There is no debate to get hammered in. If this is a debate, I win. I posted a link showing that Newt isn't going to be in the VA. primary, which he isn't. Didn't they teach you what a debate was in your many years of school?
#82
vector Wrote:I know they tryed to impeach slick Willie
But what's that got to do with anything I
Posted in this thread
If you don't even read your own cut-and-pasted posts, how can you expect anybody else to read them?

Is Paul Dateh one of your aliases? If not, then he was wrong when he wrote the following in his blog and you were wrong to post the words as your own. I give you an F for both originality and accuracy.

Does this look familiar, Einstein #2? Confusednicker:

[INDENT]
Quote:Let’s remember, Newt famously dumped wife #1 for wife #2 while wife #1 was in the hospital recovering from cancer surgery. As in literally went to the hospital to present her with divorce papers while she was recovering from surgery for uterine cancer.

He eventually dumped wife #2 for wife #3 shortly after wife #2 was diagnosed with MS back in 1999. And he was having the affair on wife #2 with wife #3 while he was turning the country upside down trying to drive Bill Clinton from office over his affair with Monica Lewinsky. - Paul Dateh's blog
[/INDENT]
#83
TheRealVille Wrote:Whatever the terminology, you can be assured that vector and I aren't the same person. Whatever you want to call it, ask a mod if we are the same person. Until you do such, don't insinuate that we are the same person.
I will take your word for what it is worth.
#84
TheRealVille Wrote:Again, I'm not getting hammered in a debate. There is no debate to get hammered in. If this is a debate, I win. I posted a link showing that Newt isn't going to be in the VA. primary, which he isn't. Didn't they teach you what a debate was in your many years of school?
You also made unsupported and unsupportable claims that Newt's failure to qualify for the Virginia primary proves that he lacks the organizational skills necessary to be president. All while refusing to compare him to our current president, who enjoys your full support. That is the debate in which you are being hammered and it is a debate that you will never win.
#85
TheRealVille Wrote:Until you figure out that you and your ilk are a minority in this country, as far as politics go Hoot, you will have a sad little life. The majority of this country don't want your "far right wing" type to have much control over the country.
This is one of your classic posts. An atheist who cannot find a single fault with the current socialist president who is presiding over the worst economy since the Great Depression - an individual living in a country where conservatives outnumber liberals by a margin of more than 2-to-1, claiming that my political views are out of step with the mainstream. :hilarious:
#86
Hoot Gibson Wrote:This is one of your classic posts. An atheist who cannot find a single fault with the current socialist president who is presiding over the worst economy since the Great Depression - an individual living in a country where conservatives outnumber liberals by a margin of more than 2-to-1, claiming that my political views are out of step with the mainstream. :hilarious:
Can you tell me what the hell atheism(which I'm not) has to do with with this thread? He might be presiding over a bad economy, but he didn't get it there without the help of your type. I've never claimed that I can't find faults with Obama. I just don't think I owe telling them to you, mainly because I don't like your smartass.


No, no, I didn't claim that. I said your type(far right wing conservatives) are a minority in this country. Most voters in this country are middle of the road moderates(like me).
#87
Hoot Gibson Wrote:You also made unsupported and unsupportable claims that Newt's failure to qualify for the Virginia primary proves that he lacks the organizational skills necessary to be president. All while refusing to compare him to our current president, who enjoys your full support. That is the debate in which you are being hammered and it is a debate that you will never win.
That didn't need support, it was just a personal opinion. I don't think he is capable of running a country, if he can't even run his campaign, and get in a primary he wanted in. Where have I posted that I support Obama?
#88
TheRealVille Wrote:Can you tell me what the hell atheism(which I'm not) has to do with with thread? I've never claimed that I can't find faults with Obama. I just don't think I owe telling them to you, mainly because I don't like your smartass.


No, no, I didn't claim that. I said your type(far right wing conservatives) are a minority in this country. Most voters in this country are middle of the road moderates.
A plurality of voters are politically right of center. A small minority share your radical ideology, defend political thugs like James Hoffa, Jr., etc. My political views are far closer to center than your's are. You are not only an atheist, you are an atheist who has regularly ridiculed the religious beliefs of other BGR members. The majority of Americans still self-identify as Christians, so your atheist beliefs and intolerant views toward Christians place you far from the political center.

I honestly could not care less whether or not a person of your ilk likes me or not.
#89
Hoot Gibson Wrote:A plurality of voters are politically right of center. A small minority share your radical ideology, defend political thugs like James Hoffa, Jr., etc. My political views are far closer to center than your's are. You are not only an atheist, you are an atheist who has regularly ridiculed the religious beliefs of other BGR members. The majority of Americans still self-identify as Christians, so your atheist beliefs and intolerant views toward Christians place you far from the political center.

I honestly could not care less whether or not a person of your ilk likes me or not.
I said I wasn't an atheist, drop the lies. I don't like some in christianity, so what? The biggest part of christians that I have met, live very far away from the bible. That doesn't make me an atheist.
#90
TheRealVille Wrote:That didn't need support, it was just a personal opinion. I don't think he is capable of running a country, if he can't even run his campaign, and get in a primary he wanted in. Where have I posted that I support Obama?
Obama has few defenders in this forum and you are one of the few foolish enough to continue defending the indefensible. You don't have to post an official endorsement to support a candidate.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)