[Hoot Gibson]

But, the republicans tried to make a big deal of the Lewinsky thing, which it was none of their business.
He wasn't impeached over sex, but he was impeached over trying to lie about the sex, of which the republicans were trying to make a big deal of, which wasn't their business. Word twist all you want, Hoot. He was acquitted, BTW. BY law, it didn't happen. I find it funny that of the two impeachments, it was the republicans trying to impeach the President, and neither stuck. As usual, the republicans are the dividers in things. For future reference, the republicans shouldn't try to impeach a President, unless they can make a case.

The lesson here is that liberal Democrats will not vote to convict a Democratic president who has obstructed justice and committed perjury. The verdict in the Senate had nothing to do with the facts of the case.

As I explained to you above, Clinton lost his license to practice law, paid a hefty fine for lying under oath, and paid Paula Jones $850,000 in exchange for her agreeing to drop her appeal. The only thing that saved Clinton's skin was the fact that there is no honor among the thieves of the US Senate.

Clinton was acquitted but that verdict was certainly not equivalent to him being found "not guilty." A party that welcomes a lying crook like Eric Holder into its Justice Department cannot be expected to mete out justice.