Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Caroline Kennedy calls Obama a "LIAR"
#1
Despite endorcing Obama in 2008,JFK daughter Caroline now considers Obama a "liar" according to a family source in Edward Klein's new book on Obama called, "The Amatuer".


Ah, this is some good stuff.Confusednicker:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/new-obam...ma-a-liar/
#2
Thank you! I appreciate your diverting RV's attention away from me!!

You're gonna catch it!
Confusednicker:
#3
I second the notion....
#4
Granny Bear Wrote:Thank you! I appreciate your diverting RV's attention away from me!!

You're gonna catch it!
Confusednicker:
You name me in just about every one of your political posts. Are you obsessed with me? I told you once I was happily married. Get over this obsession.
#5
^
wow, attitude much...
#6
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:^
wow, attitude much...
^ Can't joke around much?
#7
^
Doesnt see my sarcasm
#8
Bob Seger Wrote:Despite endorcing Obama in 2008,JFK daughter Caroline now considers Obama a "liar" according to a family source in Edward Klein's new book on Obama called, "The Amatuer".


Ah, this is some good stuff.Confusednicker:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/new-obam...ma-a-liar/




They say there's a bad apple in every barrel. When one considers the Kennedy clan they've distingushed themselves generally with honorable and even sacrificial life stories. Jack Kennedy and his heroics associated with PT 109 comes to mind. In Teddy's case however, sexual liasons under restaurant tables and Chappa Quidditch comes to mind. Jack and Teddy were literally light years apart in their political views. Jack I could deal with warts and all, Teddy is a whole nother animal. Ted supported Obama, I don't see any way Jack would have. I conceed Partrick is probably not representative of a normal Kennedy either.

Therefore, it is hardly surprising to see that Caroline (and the rest of the Kennedys) can't stomach the la-la liberalism of Obama. I too, am having a really hard time understanding the national zeal being displayed, for the wanton way in which some Americans are turning their backs on sanity and traditional American values. We embrace the "Occupiers" and wink at their ever increasing bent toward violence in their riots, which the white house insists on calling demonstations. While, the dems and the left, have tried to pin a violent and racial face on the Tea Party, which to date, is completely innocent of a notable infraction to support that claim. Example upon example, exists of dems putting party over nation, and yet, folks still continue voting democrat.

I'd like to let these folks in on a little secret. The democrats don't have any money or power not given to them by their country. The fact that we need each other has escaped these bozos, as they try their best to deal a death blow to the conservatives of this land. Remember that passe notion of checks and balances? They have done everything possible to circumvent all them, in order to advance the political platform planks of social justice. At some point the cash cow, (tax payers) will become such an endangered species, the money will simply stop flowing and then there will be anarchy.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#9
I'm betting she will still pull the Obama lever. She has even said as much. It's all that really matters in the long run.
#10
^Who knows? She said she couldn't stand to even hear him speak anymore. Two things are for sure though, first, she looks just like her Mom and second, I too have heard him speak quite enough.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#11
TheRealVille Wrote:I'm betting she will still pull the Obama lever. She has even said as much. It's all that really matters in the long run.

Even though it would mean crossing party lines, I would still think that Romney might have some appeal to the Kennedy clan if they despise Obama so much, him being a former Mass governor and all.


It makes you wonder just how mant people in this country will vote for a party rather than who they really feel may be the best candidate.

The truth is, we'll never know which lever they'll pull for sure when they get behind that curtain, regardless of what they may publicly state.
#12
Why is this news? Don't get me wrong, this story is newsworthy and it is worth a thread, but who in this world believes that Obama is NOT a liar? The media and Obama's supporters pretend that Obama is a truth teller but how many of them truly believe that he is not a lying scoundrel who will do or say anything to remain in power?

Not only is Obama a chronic liar, he is also probably the laziest president in the history of this country. I sometimes listen to Mark Levin's show and Levin reads Obama's schedule every day. It is amazing how free his calendar is. At least the media has not tried to portray Obama as a workaholic - yet. Bill Clinton was a liar but by all accounts he was also a hard worker but Barack Obama makes Clinton look like Abe Lincoln in comparison. Never have we had such a immoral man in the White House, and that includes Clinton and Nixon.
#13
^ Hoot, did you ever think there would be a day that a U.S. president would be so immoral that he would make Clinton and Nixon look like Saints? LOL

This article is another example of why everybody but the extreme left is turning on obama. He should go play some more golf and enjoy his last few months in office because he is going to be voted out in November.
#14
WideRight05 Wrote:^ Hoot, did you ever think there would be a day that a U.S. president would be so immoral that he would make Clinton and Nixon look like Saints? LOL

This article is another example of why everybody but the extreme left is turning on obama. He should go play some more golf and enjoy his last few months in office because he is going to be voted out in November.
No, I thought morally and ethically, candidates who were more dishonest and immoral than Nixon and Clinton would not be electable. I was wrong. What is even more disappointing is that at least 40 percent of American voters are solid supporters of Obama and more than 100 million people are collecting welfare checks of one kind or another.

Democrats are increasingly just voting to receive a monthly check and to avoid working for their keep. I would predict that things can get much worse, but with the number of Americans who pay no federal income taxes standing at 50 percent and rising, I think that things will get much worse before they get better. Maybe we are destined as a country to suffer through a period of extreme tyranny to make Americans regret not appreciating what they had.
#15
Hoot Gibson Wrote:No, I thought morally and ethically, candidates who were more dishonest and immoral than Nixon and Clinton would not be electable. I was wrong. What is even more disappointing is that at least 40 percent of American voters are solid supporters of Obama and more than 100 million people are collecting welfare checks of one kind or another.

Democrats are increasingly just voting to receive a monthly check and to avoid working for their keep. I would predict that things can get much worse, but with the number of Americans who pay no federal income taxes standing at 50 percent and rising, I think that things will get much worse before they get better. Maybe we are destined as a country to suffer through a period of extreme tyranny to make Americans regret not appreciating what they had.


I have interviewed, as subtlely as possible, quite a number of folks by engaging them in casual coversation with regard to their political views. All the dems I have spoken with, believe part of life are the guarantees provided by the democrat party to people who work with their hands for a living. They believe republicans are rich elitists trying to 'hog-up' as much money as they can. At one time in the distant past, I suppose the democrats did sort of care about the interests of American labor. However, these days dems play organized and unorganized labor for fools, to get their votes.

Somehow, it seems to have escaped the everyday voting man's notice, that the dems voting base is a strange montage of various special interest groups. In a way, it's almost like union organizing. Small groups of people have learned they can unite themselves in a wierd coalition to gain the political power they need to effect change that benefits only them. The list of speicial interest entities and minority groups is as diverse as it is wierd. They are the party which represents the following; (I'm sure I'll leave some out, but the point is all these groups are getting their votes bought by the dems)

-gays and lesbian agenda and their activists
-ethnic minorities
-animal rights activists
-green agenda and their activists
-evolutionists
-social justice idealism and those activists
-modern liberalists
-modern progressives
-wide open immigration standards
-modern appeasement advocates
-the liberal academia
-secular humanists
-anti-christian movement
-pro choice legislation
-feminist movement
-system of primary education/teachers


And who is it that all these groups hate? Conservative republicans, because they more closely espouse the principles and traditional values of the America we know to have existed for our first 250 years. And they represent the only credible obstacle to them getting their petty, self absorbed interests answered. Just as Israel will one day, if not today, lay claim to the prophesy which states they will be surrounded by the armies of their enemies, those who would defend traditional America are attacked by those of the list above from all sides. Somebody please explain this to me; how does organized labor possibly fit among those listed above? Talk about your strange bedfellows! The quintessential square peg in the round hole. I don't get it. On the one hand dems, and Obama in particular, talk about the hard workers in this land. While on the other, every piece of legislation in the last 4 years was for folks that are either poor or don't work at all. Am I the only one seeing the irony in the democratic platform? The party of work, no wait, not work. :igiveup:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#16
TheRealThing Wrote:I have interviewed, as subtlely as possible, quite a number of folks by engaging them in casual coversation with regard to their political views. All the dems I have spoken with, believe part of life are the guarantees provided by the democrat party to people who work with their hands for a living. They believe republicans are rich elitists trying to 'hog-up' as much money as they can. At one time in the distant past, I suppose the democrats did sort of care about the interests of American labor. However, these days dems play organized and unorganized labor for fools, to get their votes.

Somehow, it seems to have escaped the everyday voting man's notice, that the dems voting base is a strange montage of various special interest groups. In a way, it's almost like union organizing. Small groups of people have learned they can unite themselves in a wierd coalition to gain the political power they need to effect change that benefits only them. The list of speicial interest entities and minority groups is as diverse as it is wierd. They are the party which represents the following; (I'm sure I'll leave some out, but the point is all these groups are getting their votes bought by the dems)

-gays and lesbian agenda and their activists
-ethnic minorities
-animal rights activists
-green agenda and their activists
-evolutionists
-social justice idealism and those activists
-modern liberalists
-modern progressives
-wide open immigration standards
-modern appeasement advocates
-the liberal academia
-secular humanists
-anti-christian movement
-pro choice legislation
-feminist movement
-system of primary education/teachers


And who is it that all these groups hate? Conservative republicans, because they more closely espouse the principles and traditional values of the America we know to have existed for our first 250 years. And they represent the only credible obstacle to them getting their petty, self absorbed interests answered. Just as Israel will one day, if not today, lay claim to the prophesy which states they will be surrounded by the armies of their enemies, those who would defend traditional America are attacked by those of the list above from all sides. Somebody please explain this to me; how does organized labor possibly fit among those listed above? Talk about your strange bedfellows! The quintessential square peg in the round hole. I don't get it. On the one hand dems, and Obama in particular, talk about the hard workers in this land. While on the other, every piece of legislation in the last 4 years was for folks that are either poor or don't work at all. Am I the only one seeing the irony in the democratic platform? The party of work, no wait, not work. :igiveup:
Pretty good list but you left out some major constituencies like the socialists, fascists, and the member of the Communist Party USA. Of course, all except the most ardent believers of those groups pose as "progressives" in this country because of the well deserved stigma attached to political philosophies that have been directly responsible for the misery, suffering, and deaths of untold millions of human beings.
#17
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Pretty good list but you left out some major constituencies like the socialists, fascists, and the member of the Communist Party USA. Of course, all except the most ardent believers of those groups pose as "progressives" in this country because of the well deserved stigma attached to political philosophies that have been directly responsible for the misery, suffering, and deaths of untold millions of human beings.



Yeah, I knew I'd leave some good ones off the list. What an association of misfits. Obviously, they all think they have something to gain by attacking the values of the right. The one thing all these special interest groups have in common is that they want something they can't get on their own. On the grander scale the USA is the envy of the world. Her riches, her freedoms, resouces, hope and opporunity. I can see the have nots wishing for our demise globally. What I cannot understand on the lesser scale, are the homegrown folks among us who have taken on the troubles and grievances of the special interest groups as their own. It's kind of like a virile and healthy person wishing his way into the cancer wing at the hospital. I don't get it. We keep giving our country away bit by bit, in the form of more and more free goodies to any and all comers.

Take for example, the illegal alien explosion we are experiencing right now. They see it like a free trip to the world candy store. All they have to barter with is the 'want to'. When you think about it, it's very similar to Acorn employees (liberal democrats all) showing folks how to work the system. Only in this example, it's the dems in the federal government showing untold millions of illegals how to work the system and, the grand poobah and self appointed king of the US, Mr Obama, has his arms opened wide. Having cited cancer already, it is the same liberal cancer from top to bottom.

The idea was to allow a 'regulated' number of legal immigrants to come here and sieze their opportunity. But past that, the bozos that run the asylum these days think the US is responsible for the whole world. In the mind of the liberal, we Americans have too much as compared to the rest of the brotherhood of man and we don't deserve it. By that logic, they are willing to allow this mass influx of 'unregulated' humanity, to cross a border so porous, estimates suggest we have 10,000 illegals coming into this country every single day. I mean when you think about it, it wouldn't be physically possible for many more than that to cross if there wasn't any border partrol at all.

As a member of organized labor, I feel union bosses ought to hang their head when they see the company they keep as a bona-fide member of my list.

I guess the dem's new strategy is immigrate a majority in here legal or not.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#18
TheRealThing Wrote:Yeah, I knew I'd leave some good ones off the list. What an association of misfits. Obviously, they all think they have something to gain by attacking the values of the right. The one thing all these special interest groups have in common is that they want something they can't get on their own. On the grander scale the USA is the envy of the world. Her riches, her freedoms, resouces, hope and opporunity. I can see the have nots wishing for our demise globally. What I cannot understand on the lesser scale, are the homegrown folks among us who have taken on the troubles and grievances of the special interest groups as their own. It's kind of like a virile and healthy person wishing his way into the cancer wing at the hospital. I don't get it. We keep giving our country away bit by bit, in the form of more and more free goodies to any and all comers.

Take for example, the illegal alien explosion we are experiencing right now. They see it like a free trip to the world candy store. All they have to barter with is the 'want to'. When you think about it, it's very similar to Acorn employees (liberal democrats all) showing folks how to work the system. Only in this example, it's the dems in the federal government showing untold millions of illegals how to work the system and, the grand poobah and self appointed king of the US, Mr Obama, has his arms opened wide. Having cited cancer already, it is the same liberal cancer from top to bottom.

The idea was to allow a 'regulated' number of legal immigrants to come here and sieze their opportunity. But past that, the bozos that run the asylum these days think the US is responsible for the whole world. In the mind of the liberal, we Americans have too much as compared to the rest of the brotherhood of man and we don't deserve it. By that logic, they are willing to allow this mass influx of 'unregulated' humanity, to cross a border so porous, estimates suggest we have 10,000 illegals coming into this country every single day. I mean when you think about it, it wouldn't be physically possible for many more than that to cross if there wasn't any border partrol at all.

As a member of organized labor, I feel union bosses ought to hang their head when they see the company they keep as a bona-fide member of my list.

I guess the dem's new strategy is immigrate a majority in here legal or not.
Excellent points, TRT. The organized labor support among private sector unions is what I don't understand. The Democratic Party is doing everything within its power to allow Mexicans and other workers from Latin America to cross the border illegally and drive wage rates down for all American workers.

I understand why public sector unions support big government Democrats because they generally do not have to compete with cheap, illegal alien labor in their places of work because Democratic politicians award jobs to supporters who vote for them and most illegals don't vote (yet). But the blind support that the private sector union bosses give to the Democratic Party makes no sense to me.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)