[TheRealVille]

^Oh, I don't know. I sort of liked HRV's observation about the fact that "the transcript", was readily available for Candy to access, no doubt with the text embodying the words 'acts of terror' highlighted. It was a set up, and further I liked Harry's question which was how many other transcripts were at her fingertips. A couple of observations with regard to this peculiar, and in Obama's case, happy and beneficial circumstance. First, it's obvious Candy and O had discussed this thing prior to the debate because he knew all about her having the transcript. Second, sometimes even liberals get a case of conscience as was evident by Candy's reluctance to follow through completely with the plan when she tried to help Romney. Third, the so-called spontaneous, though illegal, cat calls and applause were initiated by none other than the first lady. In other words they cheated, but what's new, right?

Nobody, but wide eyed left wing extremists and their adoring spoon fed sheep buy any part of the administration's lies about Benghazi, they said it was because of the video, over and over and over and over and------

In the scheme of things, would it have made any difference in one day and 2 weeks, while they sorted it out? Why are you all so focused on the one day to 2 week timetable? Again, did you want a "shoot first, aim later" response? Or, are you just making a big deal out of talking points? Not debating, just asking.