Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Billy Graham Endorses Romney
#31
Race is tied at 47% on an NBC poll, which i find shocking.
Even more ironic is the fact that 47% is against Romney Confusednicker:
#32
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Probably a couple of million or so.
6 million.
#33
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:In the strictest use of the term, yes. I know a lot of people who say they are both a Democrat and a Christian and that both are of equal importance. It is not my job to judge them but I would submit that they are incorrect.

Ok, then all Christians can not support Romney either... there is a sect of Mormanism that believe in pligamy (sp), I don't judge them either.
#34
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:I am also aware of the ten percent margin by which men favor Romney.

The election gets down to whether there are more self-supporting taxpayers voting or more dependent freeloaders voting. If you win, you must do so with those who are, on the whole, takers and not contributors.

Then the Commonwealth of Kentucky should vote as a whole for Obama... Kentucky takes in more federal money than it puts in...
#35
tvtimeout Wrote:Ok, then all Christians can not support Romney either... there is a sect of Mormanism that believe in pligamy (sp), I don't judge them either.

Wrong. Using a "sect" of Mormonism to indict Romney is ridiculous. Romney doesn't associate, identify, or support that "sect". Of course, if you want to go so far afield, maybe we should consider all the radical Muslims who indiscriminately abuse and kill women. Your boy may or may not be a Muslim. However, it cannot be denied that he exhibits far more Islamic traits than Christian traits.

If you cannot see why avowed Christian voters would be hypocrites if they vote for your boy, you are either uninformed or a dullard.
#36
If we use TheRealVille's quote in post #27 with the percentages set forth therein and if we assume a total vote of 150,000,000, Romney wins the popular vote by almost 3,000,000. The figure used provides for the alleged 6,000,000 more women than men voting.

Of course, the winner is determined by the Electorial College and not by the popular vote. However, it would be unlikely that Kardashian would overcome that large a deficit.
#37
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:If we use TheRealVille's quote in post #27 with the percentages set forth therein and if we assume a total vote of 150,000,000, Romney wins the popular vote by almost 3,000,000. The figure used provides for the alleged 6,000,000 more women than men voting.

Of course, the winner is determined by the Electorial College and not by the popular vote. However, it would be unlikely that Kardashian would overcome that large a deficit.
You can be in denial, and hope. Doing the electoral map, by the polls of who is ahead right now, in battleground states, Obama wins. That's not even giving Obama Florida, which he has as good a chance of winning, as Romney does. Like it or not, Romney has a very hard road to the white house. But, if he makes it, I will call him President Romney.

http://www.270towin.com/

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/10/p...?hpt=hp_t2
#38
Well, TheRealVille, I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Unlike most, I don't have a high regard for the intelligence of the typical voter. However, in the end, I would hate to believe that a majority of voters would reelect a pro-Islam, anti-Christian, pro-socialist, anti-capitalist, pro-abortion, anti-life, arrogant, non-achiever who has played both the class card and the race card whenever he felt it would benefit him personally. One who is a product of social promotion and racial favors, has more than doubled the number of people receiving food stamps, increased the deficit by more than five trillion dollars in a little over three and one half years, and divided the country to an extent not seen since the Civil War. And, maybe as bad as anything else, he throws (attempts to throw) a baseball with a distinct limp wrist.

But, on the other hand, I don't have a high regard for either the intelligence of nor the work ethic of the average voter. So, I guess your boy could win. If so, I may be happy that I own real estate in another country.
#39
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Well, TheRealVille, I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Unlike most, I don't have a high regard for the intelligence of the typical voter. However, in the end, I would hate to believe that a majority of voters would reelect a pro-Islam, anti-Christian, pro-socialist, anti-capitalist, pro-abortion, anti-life, arrogant, non-achiever who has played both the class card and the race card whenever he felt it would benefit him personally. One who is a product of social promotion and racial favors, has more than doubled the number of people receiving food stamps, increased the deficit by more than five trillion dollars in a little over three and one half years, and divided the country to an extent not seen since the Civil War. And, maybe as bad as anything else, he throws (attempts to throw) a baseball with a distinct limp wrist.

But, on the other hand, I don't have a high regard for either the intelligence of nor the work ethic of the average voter. So, I guess your boy could win. If so, I may be happy that I own real estate in another country.
Damn, I sure hope you aren't a professor at Marshall, or Morehead State. I don't want my kids subjected to your rhetoric.
#40
TheRealVille Wrote:Damn, I sure hope you aren't a professor at Marshall, or Morehead State. I don't want my kids subjected to your rhetoric.

I believe in the truth. Sometimes you must call a spade a spade. Political correctness, a disease spread in many places like Marshall and Morehead, is sweet. However, it is dishonest-just as is your boy and his comrades.
#41
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:I believe in the truth. Sometimes you must call a spade a spade. Political correctness, a disease spread in many places like Marshall and Morehead, is sweet. However, it is dishonest-just as is your boy and his comrades.
I would hope, since I'm paying for tuition at either place, you aren't allowed to spread your political bullshit. Ahhh, it wouldn't matter, my girls are smarter than to fall for that.
#42
TheRealVille Wrote:I would hope, since I'm paying for tuition at either place, you aren't allowed to spread your political bullshit. Ahhh, it wouldn't matter, my girls are smarter than to fall for that.

Weak.
#43
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Weak.
Is that it? :hilarious:
#44
Your last three posts have illustrated just how weak you are in your puny effort to defend your boy. You have no rebuttal because you know that everything I have said about the boy is true.

On the other hand, I admit that it is impossible to defend one who is so incompetent, ill prepared, arrogant, and hellbent on destroying our country and turning it into another European (or Muslim) weakling.

The boy gives you nothing to work with because he is nothing. He is a fraud and a pansy. He is also a socialist. But, some do see him as "cool". But, then, some saw Benedict Arnold and Tokyo Rose as "cool".
#45
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Your last three posts have illustrated just how weak you are in your puny effort to defend your boy. You have no rebuttal because you know that everything I have said about the boy is true.

On the other hand, I admit that it is impossible to defend one who is so incompetent, ill prepared, arrogant, and hellbent on destroying our country and turning it into another European (or Muslim) weakling.

The boy gives you nothing to work with because he is nothing. He is a fraud and a pansy. He is also a socialist. But, some do see him as "cool". But, then, some saw Benedict Arnold and Tokyo Rose as "cool".
My last 3 posts have been in hoping, and expressing, that you aren't involved in my kids teaching in college.
#46
TheRealVille Wrote:My last 3 posts have been in hoping, and expressing, that you aren't involved in my kids teaching in college.

At this time, I have no connection with either institution. However, in the past I have taught law related courses for both of them. Can I assume that you have never done so?
#47
Sorry Harry Rex Vonner, but I have to disagree with this thread. I'm currently reading a book about Billy Graham, and I highly doubt that he's endorsing any politician. I remember watching one of his sermons on television where he mentioned that he once accidentally endorsed a presidential candidate, and he stated that would never happen again.

Billy Graham might encourage people to vote for biblical values, but he would never endorse a politician or a political party.
#48
Deathstar 80 Wrote:Sorry Harry Rex Vonner, but I have to disagree with this thread. I'm currently reading a book about Billy Graham, and I highly doubt that he's endorsing any politician. I remember watching one of his sermons on television where he mentioned that he once accidentally endorsed a presidential candidate, and he stated that would never happen again.

Billy Graham might encourage people to vote for biblical values, but he would never endorse a politician or a political party.

You must have missed the video of his statement. He mentioned that this would likely be his last presidential race so I would assume that he felt that there was no reason to be neutral. As I said, he didn't mention Romney by name but, if you see the video, his message was quite obvious. I'm aware of his previous stance and the reason for it. However, his circumstances at this stage of his life are different.
#49
Harry Rex Vonner, is this what you were talking about? Here's the link:

http://www.billygraham.org/vote-biblical.../index.asp

^I honestly don't mean this personally Harry Rex Vonner, but I still have to disagree with you. I've been watching Billy Graham preach for a few years now on his television show, and it doesn't seem like Billy Graham to endorse any politician. He's well-known to try to be non-partisan in order for everyone, both republicans and democrats, to accept his teachings of the gospel.
#50
Deathstar 80 Wrote:Harry Rex Vonner, is this what you were talking about? Here's the link:

http://www.billygraham.org/vote-biblical.../index.asp

^I honestly don't mean this personally Harry Rex Vonner, but I still have to disagree with you. I've been watching Billy Graham preach for a few years now on his television show, and it doesn't seem like Billy Graham to endorse any politician. He's well-known to try to be non-partisan in order for everyone, both republicans and democrats, to accept his teachings of the gospel.

That is exactly it. As I said, Dr. Graham named no candidate. However, if you read the message, particularly in regard to biblical definition of marriage and sanctity of life, there is question as to his preference for Romney.

While he doesn't endorse, his choice could not be clearer.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)