[Hoot Gibson]

I think you just described how you see the world more than you made a persuasive point.

Being "complex" has nothing to do with character. Al Capone had many friends, created many jobs, was intelligent, and undoubtedly enriched the lives of many of those around him, including some of the political leaders in Chicago. You could say that Capone was "complex" but few people would say that he was a model citizen. Why? Because, despite never being convicted of anything more serious than the white collar crime of tax evasion, Capone was widely believed to be a murderous thug. Was he a good guy, or was he simply "complex?"

The only things that the Koch brothers have in common with George Soros is that all of them are wealthy and politically active. History is heavily populated with individuals who were wealthy, politically active, and "complex." George Washington, Ted Turner, Andrew Carnegie, Jordan's King Hussein, Adolf Hitler, and Joseph Stalin all fit that description. Some were great men who left the world better than they found it, some were controversial, and some were simply evil men who left death and destruction in their paths while they pursued political power and personal wealth.

Your insistence that Soros's "complexity" makes him just like the Koch brothers and excuses his evil deeds does not pass the smell test. Great men (and women) do great things. They do not enrich themselves by inflicting pain and despair on others. The Kochs are builders. Soros is a destroyer. Complexity does not factor into the equation.