Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How Did We Get to the Point That We Could Consider a Communist for Pr
#81
Hoot Gibson Wrote:Your ignorance of our economy never ceases to amaze me. Either through ignorance or by design socialists like you often confuse lower tax rates and exemptions with subsidies. All of the money earned by individuals and corporations belongs to them until their government takes it from them. Money earned by corporations is double taxed because shareholders's dividends are taxed. Even when a corporation manages to avoid corporate taxes, its shareholders still pay taxes on the income it generates.

Lowering corporate tax rates benefits shareholders, who include those retirees and those saving for retirement through 401k plans. Your assertion that economic policies that lower the cost of doing business in this country help only a few people is just raw ignorance on parade. Most people who pay taxes in this country work for a corporation. Corporations do not pay taxes. Their taxes are ultimately paid by their customers, employees, and shareholders.Socialists like you have bought into the notion of free government services with total disregard for those of us who actually pay a heavy price for those free services.


Exactly right. Corporations are nothing more than the written agreement by which the shareholders, employees, and management engage in US commerce. The corporation is according to the US Supreme Court, the people of whom it is comprised. From the janitor to the CEO, to the people who own the stock and participate in proxy votes to establish certain policy. As you say, the way things stand corporations are double taxed. That being the personal income taxes paid by each person involved plus, separate ccorporate taxation.

The various rulings of the court regarding the above, have had the left foaming at the mouth since they were handed down. Of course, the fact that the left sue corporations in an endless string of demands for money which are limited only to clever imagination, is none-the-less A-OK behavior though.

I do not believe there is an ounce of difference between today's liberal and those who existed at the time of our nation's founding. And speaking Ben Frankly, I believe that is why the founders were able to so skillfully craft our founding documents in a way the has kept them (libs) at bay for so long.

There is however a widening gulf, a separation if you will, which has appeared between a correct understanding of the truth of our heritage, and the consciousness of the people. Which lack of consciousness varies in degree of severity even in the halls of Congress. AOC and her pals demonstrating a disparity which is the most severe, to that of Mitt Romney and other RINO's. The voter has been the only serious check on the rabid liberal's encroachment to date as we saw beginning in 2010 when Dems were swept out of House control. Further, I believe it is arguable that this year's election will either confirm the afore mentioned gulf to have arrived at the point of existential severity, or will prove the voter still has enough wherewithal to stave off liberalism a decade or two longer.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
How Did We Get to the Point That We Could Consider a Communist for Pr - by TheRealThing - 02-16-2020, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)