[Cardfan1]

Like so may things you post on here, the only tweet involved here is the one which is evidently bouncing around in your head. There was NO tweet on which the percentage was based. It was just to prove the number came from the news media community. You posted a chart generated by the very lying media you always defend on here, in which they give themselves, top billing for honesty. :please:

Jet's point was simply and plainly enough put; the negative media coverage of this President has been north of 95%. And there are tons of corroborative souces out there. But then along comes the Cardfan who thinks he is clever enough to in real time, revise the conversation as hinging somehow on a tweet. Wrong. But keep lying to yourself, it is a clinic in projection, bias, denial and revisionist blather.

Some of the sources you posted didn’t support the 95% and then were extremely deniable.
I want to apologize for holding you guys to standard of some truth.
Sorry that you guys use questionable sources that make up facts. You said it “fiction is fact.”