Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hagans Coming Back Next Year??
#1
This could just be a stirring of the pot and mishap in judgement which he’s been known for as of late. But Hagans said in a reply to Nick Richards that “we will miss you”

Definitely a lot of reaching with this and what it means but it could happen is suppose.

https://twitter.com/kysportsradio/status...68672?s=21
If you need any assistance or want to report a problem feel free to PM me and we will get it taken care of!  Thank you for choosing to be apart of the BGR community!
#BBFL
#2
ESPN reporting all seniors may get an extra year of eligibility if they would like to compete another year. Interesting to watch as this could also cause some recruits to change schools.
#3
This is definitely something to look at going forward.
If you need any assistance or want to report a problem feel free to PM me and we will get it taken care of!  Thank you for choosing to be apart of the BGR community!
#BBFL
#4
Rainingthrees Wrote:ESPN reporting all seniors may get an extra year of eligibility if they would like to compete another year. Interesting to watch as this could also cause some recruits to change schools.

Were that to happen, the domino effect would be insane.
#5
JokersWild24 Wrote:Were that to happen, the domino effect would be insane.

They made a post yesterday that they are unlikely to allow Christmas sport seniors to return for another season. So no Nate Sestina again it’s looking.
If you need any assistance or want to report a problem feel free to PM me and we will get it taken care of!  Thank you for choosing to be apart of the BGR community!
#BBFL
#6
Spud6 Wrote:They made a post yesterday that they are unlikely to allow Christmas sport seniors to return for another season. So no Nate Sestina again it’s looking.

If they allow it to happen:

1. Any chance that the transfer portal were anything short of free agency would be taken out back and shot in the head;

2. Schools and players would have to make a decision on whether to honor a scholarship/commitment, especially for incoming freshman whose status in regards to playing time, asking out of a LOI, or redshirting just got rather cut-throat;

3. Smaller schools either have their talent raided by larger programs or face budget problems where the caused by the cost of an additional player that they would not have had otherwise (and no one else thought was good enough to try and snatch from them);

4. In large part, the rich would get richer as the primary beneficiaries of this change are your national powerhouses like Kentucky-- they usually don't use all of their scholarships (or might give one to a kid who'd still walk-on without one anyway), the variable cost per player for the program isn't even a consideration in their athletics budget, they get an extra year from the grad transfer that they plucked from another school last year & they're also first in line for any kid that they want to offer as the deck shuffles again;
#7
He gone. Probably a good decision for him honestly. I could see him sticking around the league as a second team defense-oriented point guard, especially for a team that plays up-tempo. He'll have his "combine" from UK's pre-season set-up and risks coming back another year and not really showing a significant amount of improvement in terms of what teams would want to see out of a lottery pick.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)