[TheRealThing]

I don't consider Judge Napolitano much of a constitutional expert. I have not heard Mark Levin's analysis yet but I believe that he is a much more credible source for constitutional law. Napolitano is just a few notches above Obama, IMO.

Care to explain the specifics behind this statement?

Can you give me 4-5 examples of the flaws in his constitutional thinking? I'd greatly appreciate it! Truly!!

Also, where did you go to Law School yourself.. and as a professor, educating young minds on constitutional law, where is it you teach? I'm actually thinking about transferring to a new Juris Doctorate program (at a new school) and need the help of someone like yourself!

My father always told me that only a true expert can declare whether another is an expert.

Thanks a bunch buddy! Love readin your stuff!

Thanks for the guidance about how I should construct a response, but as I am not a student, I am not accepting writing assignments at this time.

I do not profess to be an expert on Constitutional law and I am not an attorney. However, I have 10 years experience in the field of military justice and considerable experience drafting various legal agreements (always subject to reviews by actual attorneys). I know enough about the law to recognize experts on Constitutional law. Alan Dershowitz and Mark Levin fit that description, in my opinion. Judge Napolitano is a former NJ Superior Court judge who I consider more of an entertainer than a legal expert. That is not really a knock on him, as I usually do agree with his on air opinions but he is not widely considered an expert in the field on the same level as others who have devoted more of time to the subject.

When Judge Napolitano's opinions differ from those of Dershowitz and/or Levin, I choose to believe the opinions of those two to be more likely correct than Judge Napolitano's opinions. That does not mean that I consider myself to be more of an expert on the U.S. Constitution than any judge or attorney who has passed a bar exam.

BTW, a true expert is somebody who lives out of state who is hired to certify reserve estimates in case a scapegoat is needed later. At least that is a role that mining engineering experts often fill.

Napolitano has inserted himself into the situation in Louisville. After the findings of the grand jury were announced he gets o up on national TV rejecting the validity of the findings which determined whether or not charges should be brought against the three officers involved in the Taylor shooting. In a shameless display of grandiose lime lighting, he characterized himself as somehow able to see through the legal process in Louisville, categorically pronouncing it obviously 'flawed even manipulated,' by the the prosecution.

Taylor's boyfriend, despite officers having identified themselves as law enforcement, shot 7 times through the door from within the residence. A nearby neighbor confirmed that the officers, who btw were dispatched to search the premises under weigh of a no-knock warrant, did in fact identify themselves repeatedly to those within the home. Now imagine yourself shooting through your front door 7 times at police and try to make credible argument for having done so. The very idea is absurd.

Napolitano ignored those facts for the most part and cast ALL the doubt on the officers involved. I have no use for the guy.