[The Outsider]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

[Hoot Gibson]

More ignorance on display. 

Transporting large volumes of data in vehicles is a common practice. I have done it myself when I worked for a consulting company in Indianapolis. Our largest client's facility was located 40 miles outside of the city in the middle of fields of corn and soybeans. We used large, rugged containers to transport tapes containing backup data, which was part of the client's disaster recovery plan. The tapes were stored in a fireproof vault in the consultant's office.

It is also not unusual for IT offices to be located in remote areas. The cost of living is much lower in rural areas and small towns than it is in most major cities. If an area has a low cost of living and fast internet speeds, it can be an ideal location for an IT facility.

Do you propagandists really think that it would have been more efficient for the subcontractor to send its entire staff from Montana to Phoenix to analyze the data? There is nothing illegal or unethical to have people working on a project to sign nondisclosure agreements and perform work in their own office. If the data had been transferred over the internet, which would have been a less secure alternative, I can only imagine what your reaction would have been. By driving the data from Arizona to Montana, the chain of custody was maintained and there was no chance that the data would be hacked.

[TheRealThing]

^^ Take it easy on them Hoot. They're tying to protect that house of cards construct that mushrooms like AOC have put together with as much forethought as used when swatting flies.

[vector#1]

They might as well have transported the ballots to Hoot Gibson's basement "lab."

That would be Quooter's Mom basement

[TheRealThing]

The audits are not fake, but vector is. lol

[Hoot Gibson]

^^Just a figment of Cardfan1's imagination. Nothing but a disposable account.

[The Outsider]

^^ Take it easy on them Hoot. They're tying to protect that house of cards construct that mushrooms like AOC have put together with as much forethought as used when swatting flies.

We will find out whose house of cards comes tumbling down when Trump gets hit with RICO charges.

[Hoot Gibson]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

[The Outsider]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

[Hoot Gibson]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

[Cardfan1]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

[The Outsider]

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/ari...00854.html

Finally someone who makes sense.

An unofficial bipartisan election analysis conducted respectively to the Senate-led recount of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona's Maricopa County concluded that Republicans disenchanted with then-President Donald Trump were responsible for his loss in the 2020 election.


White said 59,800 people did not vote for Trump despite voting for mostly GOP candidates down the ballot. The results of his analysis showed 39,102 of those Republican voters crossed the aisle to cast a vote for then-candidate Joe Biden.

"I have good friends that just argue with me constantly that there's no way that Joe Biden could have gotten 80 million votes. I say, 'Well, he did because a lot of Republicans voted for him,'" he told the Washington Examiner.

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

[Hoot Gibson]

The analysis was performed by a Democrat, an independent, and a black Republican who was endorsed by a black Democratic Congresswoman. I am sure that it was an objective study absent political bias.   Any article that disparages Trump makes sense to you.

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

[jetpilot]

^^^Easy to spot brainwashed dumb people. They would be arguing the other side of every issue and be just as sure they are right and calling you names if their liberal TV told them to. They have no sense, no values, no ideas, no solutions, no morals, no couth, no ability to think for themselves. You can spot these people a mile away in the first 5 seconds they open their mouth...

[vector#1]

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

Quooter just remember this if the 2024 election goes the your way don't cry about what is going on today. The Trumpsters have made a lot of BAD things normal.

---

^^^Easy to spot brainwashed dumb people. They would be arguing the other side of every issue and be just as sure they are right and calling you names if their liberal TV told them to. They have no sense, no values, no ideas, no solutions, no morals, no couth, no ability to think for themselves. You can spot these people a mile away in the first 5 seconds they open their mouth...

This is coming from one of the 3 Clowns who want a King.

[Cardfan1]

What does someone being black have to do with anything?  

Benny White, a Republican election researcher who previously ran for Pima County recorder, joined with Democrat Larry Moore and independent Tim Halvorsen, two retired executives from election company Clear Ballot, performed an analysis of the cast vote record in the November general election in Maricopa County. White has worked on over two dozen previous election audits, and Moore has had experience in more than 200, White told the Washington Examiner.

White, who said he voted for Trump in both elections, spent weeks with his team analyzing the cast vote record, which was obtained through a public records request on May 7. The data can be used to confirm vote tabulations and better understand voting patterns and behavior.

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

[Hoot Gibson]

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

High minority cities are the target of investigations of election rigging because that is where the evidence is, Twin Ticks. You know, like videos of election officials forcibly denying Republican observers of doing their jobs, taping cardboard over the windows to a room where Democrats were counting votes to prevent observers from using binoculars to observe what Democrat vote counters were doing, scanning the same batches of ballots multiple times, etc. 

You are a liar to your core, Twin Ticks.

[TheRealThing]

There are no Trump supporters among the Congressional Black Caucus. The fact that he was endorsed by a black Democrat means that it is very unlikely that the Republican is a Trump supporter. The bottom line is that the study that you believe made sense was done by three individuals opposed to Trump's campaign. I don't believe that a Trump supporting Republican would have been endorsed by a member of the CBC. Politicians lie and I don't believe Benny White.

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

At this point if there were any threat to Republican's pending what you claim, without evidence, are sham audits; even as stupid as you say they are, they'd never do an audit. But sham investigations and sham impeachments and sham news are your side's forte there Cardfan. Irony; the guy who cannot force the first shred of truth out of his mouth or his keyboard, is on here slamming others for half truths. BTW, I tried to add up your truths and came up with absolute zero.

Same old ploy. You arbitrarily certify the farcical circus of lies perpetrated against the legitimately elected government of DJT as valid. This you use to shame Trump as a 'lowlife' which therefore to read what you tripe, I mean type; one supposedly cannot believe anything associated with government of the past 4 years. Further, you equate belief in the truth to Trumpism, or some such convoluted idiocy, which tactic supposedly gives your side a nuclear olly-olly home free any time you get called out for yet another lie.

So in the typically shameless revisionist fashion of which the left is now so renowned, you declare the Mueller Probe as somehow supportive that any evidence of Trump lawlessness was uncovered. Which of course nothing could be farther from the truth. But then as we have already established. If you're typing, you're lying.

[vector#1]

so, Hooter, if an audit is ran by biased political hacks then it can’t be legit?

I’ll be damned…You’re finally coming around.

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

At this point if there were any threat to Republican's pending what you claim, without evidence, are sham audits; even as stupid as you say they are, they'd never do an audit. But sham investigations and sham impeachments and sham news are your side's forte there Cardfan. Irony; the guy who cannot force the first shred of truth out of his mouth or his keyboard, is on here slamming others for half truths. BTW, I tried to add up your truths and came up with absolute zero.

Same old ploy. You arbitrarily certify the farcical circus of lies perpetrated against the legitimately elected government of DJT as valid. This you use to shame Trump as a 'lowlife' which therefore to read what you tripe, I mean type; one supposedly cannot believe anything associated with government of the past 4 years. Further, you equate belief in the truth to Trumpism, or some such convoluted idiocy, which tactic supposedly gives your side a nuclear olly-olly home free any time you get called out for yet another lie.

So in the typically shameless revisionist fashion of which the left is now so renowned, you declare the Mueller Probe as somehow supportive that any evidence of Trump lawlessness was uncovered. Which of course nothing could be farther from the truth. But then as we have already established. If you're typing, you're lying.

TRT their was Russian help from Dear Leader campaign that's a FACT. Now did the Dear Leader know what his campaign manager was up to we don't know YET. But Dear Leader did give him a pardon so we might not never know.

[Hoot Gibson]

There sure is a lot of irony in his statement, although I doubt that he or his crew see it.

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

At this point if there were any threat to Republican's pending what you claim, without evidence, are sham audits; even as stupid as you say they are, they'd never do an audit. But sham investigations and sham impeachments and sham news are your side's forte there Cardfan. Irony; the guy who cannot force the first shred of truth out of his mouth or his keyboard, is on here slamming others for half truths. BTW, I tried to add up your truths and came up with absolute zero.

Same old ploy. You arbitrarily certify the farcical circus of lies perpetrated against the legitimately elected government of DJT as valid. This you use to shame Trump as a 'lowlife' which therefore to read what you tripe, I mean type; one supposedly cannot believe anything associated with government of the past 4 years. Further, you equate belief in the truth to Trumpism, or some such convoluted idiocy, which tactic supposedly gives your side a nuclear olly-olly home free any time you get called out for yet another lie.

So in the typically shameless revisionist fashion of which the left is now so renowned, you declare the Mueller Probe as somehow supportive that any evidence of Trump lawlessness was uncovered. Which of course nothing could be farther from the truth. But then as we have already established. If you're typing, you're lying.

TRT their was Russian help from Dear Leader campaign that's a FACT. Now did the Dear Leader know what his campaign manager was up to we don't know YET. But Dear Leader did give him a pardon so we might not never know.

You are a serial liar, Twin Ticks/dumber half.

[Hoot Gibson]

It's your turn to post, Twin Ticks/dumb. 

[vector#1]

You see irony everywhere with regards to people who disagree with you. You cited a "study" by three biased individuals that reached a conclusion that any Trump critics could have reached. Do you really believe that any election audits are going to be initiated by neutral parties? Are you that stupid? Why would a neutral party call for an audit? That being said, the Maricopa County forensic audit has involved many Democrats as observers and in other capacities. Unlike the way that elections in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Detroit were conducted, Democrat observers have not been kept at a distance requiring binoculars and they have not been kept outside, nor have they had their view blocked by pizza boxes taped to the windows of the hall where the audit is being conducted.

If you and your socialist friends have a problem with how the audit is being conducted, then you should have had major issues with how the election was conducted. Yet, all I recall were weak attempts to defend everything that Democrats running the elections did, including falsely reporting a broken water main in Atlanta and sending the Republican observers home so that Democrats could be alone with the ballots. Where were your objections then? Where were your allegations of bias when many thousands of votes were counted while Republicans were excluded from the process that really counted?

Hypocrites. No one word describes the four of you any better.

dang… if you add all those half-truths up you may get 2 1/2…possibly.

what is the endgame of all these biased audits, Hooter? 

I do find it concerning that Trumplicans want to point to high minority cities as points of election cheating.
If Trumplicans ever wonder why they can’t get minorities to believe in them there is a nice place to start.  

also, Hooter, you would be filling your TRUMP diapers if Democrats were doing the same as these audits are.  
 How many pairs of drawers did you ruin while Mueller was investigating?  Enough to realize you need to move to TRUMPIES.   

At this point if there were any threat to Republican's pending what you claim, without evidence, are sham audits; even as stupid as you say they are, they'd never do an audit. But sham investigations and sham impeachments and sham news are your side's forte there Cardfan. Irony; the guy who cannot force the first shred of truth out of his mouth or his keyboard, is on here slamming others for half truths. BTW, I tried to add up your truths and came up with absolute zero.

Same old ploy. You arbitrarily certify the farcical circus of lies perpetrated against the legitimately elected government of DJT as valid. This you use to shame Trump as a 'lowlife' which therefore to read what you tripe, I mean type; one supposedly cannot believe anything associated with government of the past 4 years. Further, you equate belief in the truth to Trumpism, or some such convoluted idiocy, which tactic supposedly gives your side a nuclear olly-olly home free any time you get called out for yet another lie.

So in the typically shameless revisionist fashion of which the left is now so renowned, you declare the Mueller Probe as somehow supportive that any evidence of Trump lawlessness was uncovered. Which of course nothing could be farther from the truth. But then as we have already established. If you're typing, you're lying.

TRT their was Russian help from Dear Leader campaign that's a FACT. Now did the Dear Leader know what his campaign manager was up to we don't know YET. But Dear Leader did give him a pardon so we might not never know.

You are a serial liar, Twin Ticks/dumber half.

Quooter this has been proven the Trumpsters King worked with the Russians to help him get elected.