[vector#1]

^^ He's tried to mock the truth with some pretty weak and run-of-the-mill arguments, not of his own no doubt, and those not having the desired effect he has fallen back on the lib standby. Slamming Trump.

Other than a few incidentals I buy into very little of what Hound put's up because in order to make such silly and unfounded statements, one has to necessary leap frog over the obvious. Which of course is factual American history, our heritage and last but not least current events. Not to mention the stand his own family takes on the matter and the memories of his own lifetime.

The founders for example were not "worried about men like Trump" and they were certainly not worried about the Church's possible encroachment upon government. To say that is to lie. The Declaration of Independence makes it clear that in fact, America were basing her break with King George and the English Empire on the authority of God. Past that our own documents make it clear they were worried that government would have the same polluting impact on the Church in the US that it did on the Church in England.

But because of such revisionist heresy one has to continually vet the premise upon which a usurper like Old School Hound makes his arguments. And frankly they're tiring of the revision route anyway because the documents and history are inescapably there to analyze when needed. Hence the thoughts, heart, and intents of the founders may always be revisited and thus the liberal argument could never prevail. Out side of the shallow minds of those glom-on libs who need to be led around of course. Therefore cometh the 1619 project which like in the movie Terminator prequel, they go back in time to change history altogether. Our founding is totally skipped in other words in favor of a historical narrative which suits their palate. The whole thing of course is just another liberal pack of lies.

TRT you are badly wrong on this part  "worried about men like Trump" The founding Fathers NO longer wanted a King and this is exactly what you and the other 2 Trumpsters on here want. If you and the other 2 Trumpsters still support that guy after what he has and still doing then YES you want a King. 

---

^^ He's tried to mock the truth with some pretty weak and run-of-the-mill arguments, not of his own no doubt, and those not having the desired effect he has fallen back on the lib standby. Slamming Trump.

Other than a few incidentals I buy into very little of what Hound put's up because in order to make such silly and unfounded statements, one has to necessary leap frog over the obvious. Which of course is factual American history, our heritage and last but not least current events. Not to mention the stand his own family takes on the matter and the memories of his own lifetime.

The founders for example were not "worried about men like Trump" and they were certainly not worried about the Church's possible encroachment upon government. To say that is to lie. The Declaration of Independence makes it clear that in fact, America were basing her break with King George and the English Empire on the authority of God. Past that our own documents make it clear they were worried that government would have the same polluting impact on the Church in the US that it did on the Church in England.

But because of such revisionist heresy one has to continually vet the premise upon which a usurper like Old School Hound makes his arguments. And frankly they're tiring of the revision route anyway because the documents and history are inescapably there to analyze when needed. Hence the thoughts, heart, and intents of the founders may always be revisited and thus the liberal argument could never prevail. Out side of the shallow minds of those glom-on libs who need to be led around of course. Therefore cometh the 1619 project which like in the movie Terminator prequel, they go back in time to change history altogether. Our founding is totally skipped in other words in favor of a historical narrative which suits their palate. The whole thing of course is just another liberal pack of lies.

Great post, well-stated. Hound's 1/6 rant is just straight-up idiotic. He still doesn't get it that the only person killed in the fake insurrection was an unarmed Trump supporter shot by police. Plus his brain-dead president just clearly stated you need F-15s and nukes to take down the government, not a few dozen unarmed senior citizens led by police into one room in one building in Washington D.C. You really just have to have a screw loose to believe there was an insurrection on 1/6.

Jet over 140 Police Officers Injured and over 545 Trump Supporters have been arrested so far it wasn't NO picnic or what does your people call it a Normal Tourist Visit.