[Hoot Gibson]

interesting comment...since its not risky I guess that is why George W. and the rest of that admin gave a permit for the drilling site after letting BP write their own environmental review and consultation documents relating to the Endangered Species Act. The documents did not include any plan as to how they would navigate an issue such as what we have in the gulf. There only statements in the documents were that at its worse a "spill" would be 20 thousand barrels a day. Oh and by the way the documents are supposed to contain such information as their plans on oil clean up.

also "[SIZE=2]This is in reference to the "spill" and also BP's permit to continue in Alaska with a project called "Liberty" which is a new "state of the art" drilling method called horizontial drilling." that was me not a part of the excerpt...[/SIZE]

After rereading your post, the following is obvious:

• It is impossible to distinguish between your mistake and the bloggers' mistakes because you do not identify whose words belong to whom.
  
• In your response, you referred to material in the blog that is not in your excerpt. How about including a link next time and putting the excerpt inside a quote element?
  

My response was merely to correct the implication that horizontal drilling is an experimental method. It's not.

If you want to debate a blogger's opinion, the least you could do is provide a link to the full text.

Thanks.