[Bob Seger]

No, I did not miss your point at all but you did not answer my question. You cited the fact that Paul is not qualified because he wears a "white coat," a reference to the fact that Paul is a doctor. In Conway's case, you mentioned that his "experience isn't much more relevant."

My question is why do you believe that having experience as a doctor is irrelevant to representing the people of Kentucky? Numerically, attorneys in this country have been over-represented in Congress more than any other group and look at the job that most of them have done. Assuming Rand Paul would have been willing to have read the Obamacare bill, would his input have been less valuable than the views of 57 attorneys, most of whom were to busy to read the bill before voting upon it? Would Rand Paul not have been a valuable asset to the Senate during the hearings that preceded the vote (that is, had the Democrats not written most of the bill behind closed doors)?

Former Majority Leader Bill Frist was a very successful heart surgeon and I believe that he was a fairly competent US Senator. Why do you think that Rand Paul's medical training would be a liability?

lol... Good luck Hoot, but I dont think you're going to get an answer to yours either. At least one that makes sense anyways.