Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary Clinton in 2016? Buzz grows after video surfaces
#1
Quote:A new video has people around the Hudson Valley buzzing that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may again have her eyes on the White House.
The video aired recently at a conference of government officials and Mideast-focused thinkers. The video introduced the event's keynote speaker, Clinton, who is expected to step down as secretary of state soon.
The video, highly complimentary of Clinton and artistically shot, has many observers calling it her first 2016 campaign ad.


http://newyork.newsday.com/westchester/n...-1.4311825
#2
[YOUTUBE="Gingrich: GOP can't compete with Hillary"]V0XCvC24d2s[/YOUTUBE]
#3
Assuming the electorate continues its rapid move toward more dependence upon the government for its daily wants, there is no way a Republican can beat any Democrat in 2016. Hillary, quite matronly in appearance though not in philosophy, would beat any Republican by continuing the free gravy train.
#4
Catchy campaign slogan: "Less work and more free stuff, who's with me!!!!!"
Seriously, the only Clinton I have ever liked is George.
#5
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Assuming the electorate continues its rapid move toward more dependence upon the government for its daily wants, there is no way a Republican can beat any Democrat in 2016. Hillary, quite matronly in appearance though not in philosophy, would beat any Republican by continuing the free gravy train.



We will see. High unemployment and a tanking economy can no longer be blamed on Bush. Not that anybody with an IQ over 60 would have bought the ridiculous party line, blame-game propaganda anyway, but in any event, a win will take the wind out of the liberal sails. I mean, who would have believed Obama could hang the responsibility for his administration's four years of amature hour failures on Bush in the first place? Republicans need to stick to their guns and slug it out over the voter fraud issues that are abrew. We will lose it, if American's find they can no longer trust the elective process in this country. The fact that so many dems are willing to use the law, to break the law, in matters of oft proven voter fraud with organizations like Acorn, proves them to be unfit to lead. BTW, wasn't it devasting the way AG Eric Holder came down on Acorn for the cases of voter fraud they are known to be guilty of? Of course, if every last conservative voter is not willing to invest a mere 15 minutes once every four years to go vote, it's over anyway, and you will be shown to be exactly correct, the takers will show up in force again to vote to protect their continued ride on the gravy train.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#6
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Assuming the electorate continues its rapid move toward more dependence upon the government for its daily wants, there is no way a Republican can beat any Democrat in 2016. Hillary, quite matronly in appearance though not in philosophy, would beat any Republican by continuing the free gravy train.

Who knows when a Republican will defeat a Democrat again?

This administration has America right where they want them. They have the political control and I guess that's what they have desired all along. This being the case, they are as foolish as the free-rider's and gimme' program recipients.

Sad, sad times.
#7
Its hard to understand why anyone would even want to think about her as a president.
#8
MiddlesboroAlumni Wrote:Who knows when a Republican will defeat a Democrat again?

This administration has America right where they want them. They have the political control and I guess that's what they have desired all along. This being the case, they are as foolish as the free-rider's and gimme' program recipients.

Sad, sad times.

You are correct. With the large plurality that decides elections becoming more and more dependent upon the government for its handouts, the Republican Party cannot win unless it becomes another Democrat Party. Even then, the Democrat Party has a large head start and has pretty much cornered the market on takers.

This plurality has no work ethic, no self respect, no self motivation, little formal intelligence, and even less morals. They blame their plight on the "rich" (anyone with more than them), the bigots (anyone who doesn't automatically buy into the racist, sexist, homophobic, judgmental excuse lines), and the narrow minded (anyone who doesn't approve of their "if it feels good, do it and to hell with the consequences" credo).

Yes, MiddlesboroAlumni, this country is in big trouble. What happens when the traditionalists run out of money, the government can't borrow any more from China, and the printing presses print so many dollars that they are worth no more than used toilet paper? What will this plurality made up of blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals, dependent single women, union thugs, dope heads, convicts, mindless college students, spiritual rejects, and all the other various and sundry negative and oddball groups do? Even Obama's teleprompter will be speechless.
#9
If any of you doubt that the country is in big trouble, turn on your televisions and tune in to the right to work/freedom for workers vote taking place in the Michigan Legislature. The process is being disrupted by a bunch of union thugs and their usual lemmings wearing red shirts. It appears that the average weight of the "red shirters", male and female, is around 260 pounds with the average IQ of this group somewhere in the low 60s. But I may be a bit generous in that analysis. Where are those who support the right to work law? Why, they are at work, of course, earning their own living and paying federal, state, and local income taxes to provide the freebies for the red shirts and their ilk.
#11
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:You are correct. With the large plurality that decides elections becoming more and more dependent upon the government for its handouts, the Republican Party cannot win unless it becomes another Democrat Party. Even then, the Democrat Party has a large head start and has pretty much cornered the market on takers.

This plurality has no work ethic, no self respect, no self motivation, little formal intelligence, and even less morals. They blame their plight on the "rich" (anyone with more than them), the bigots (anyone who doesn't automatically buy into the racist, sexist, homophobic, judgmental excuse lines), and the narrow minded (anyone who doesn't approve of their "if it feels good, do it and to hell with the consequences" credo).

Yes, MiddlesboroAlumni, this country is in big trouble. What happens when the traditionalists run out of money, the government can't borrow any more from China, and the printing presses print so many dollars that they are worth no more than used toilet paper? What will this plurality made up of blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals, dependent single women, union thugs, dope heads, convicts, mindless college students, spiritual rejects, and all the other various and sundry negative and oddball groups do? Even Obama's teleprompter will be speechless.

:Clap:

I hate to laugh at this, but it's true.
#12
The American public has already proved how stupid it is. I do not see them getting any smarter over the next four years so unless Hillary is taken up by beings from outer space she will win
#13
the other guy Wrote:The American public has already proved how stupid it is. I do not see them getting any smarter over the next four years so unless Hillary is taken up by beings from outer space she will win



Not likely, we must assume beings from space would be smarter than the average American voter, they wouldn't want her either. :biggrin:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)