Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Spinning of "you Didn't Build That"
#31
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Where have you been? It is common knowledge that the Kardashians have become celebrities by doing absolutely nothing. Thus, since the Kardashian approach mirrors the path of your president in the area of non-achievement, he must be a Kardashian. "Kim" and "Chloe" were already taken. Therefore, "Bucky" Kardashian.

The similarities are amazing.
Hey now he earned a "Nobel Prize" for doing................oh never mind
#32
TheRealVille Wrote:Sure they were, and you know it, but I know you are not man enough to admit it. You gotta stray true to your politics.
You are an Obama parrot. Right from his website to this forum. Obama says that he was taken out of context, so you repeat it. Obama and his minions said make Trayvon Martin out to be a racist and you gladly did his bidding with no evidence.

Not man enough? Who do you think you are kidding here? You have no mind of your own. You are simply a conduit for the flow of Obama's disinformation campaign.
#33
I’m not accusing you of pot smoking, and I DEFINATLEY don’t want to watch you pee. I was merely taking you at your word. You had said in another thread that you smoke pot from time to time…that’s all.
The unsubstantiated, empty (meaningless) sexist, personal remarks that I was talking about wasn’t describing your personal appearance. Again, YOU described yourself as tatted. Those adjectives were meant to describe your remarks. It just seems to me that when you’re obviously incorrect, or someone poses an intelligent question that you don’t have an answer for, you resort to personal , thinly veiled, negative innuendoes. I mean what the hell does my husband’s attention to me or what I may be reading have to do with ANYTHING remotely related to this thread?
So YOU be a man, and realize how your comments have nothing to do with any kind of a responsible answer to my post….even if you disagree. Frankly, I could care less how many Harleys you ride or how many tattoos you currently are sporting.
#34
Granny Bear Wrote:I’m not accusing you of pot smoking, and I DEFINATLEY don’t want to watch you pee. I was merely taking you at your word. You had said in another thread that you smoke pot from time to time…that’s all.
The unsubstantiated, empty (meaningless) sexist, personal remarks that I was talking about wasn’t describing your personal appearance. Again, YOU described yourself as tatted. Those adjectives were meant to describe your remarks. It just seems to me that when you’re obviously incorrect, or someone poses an intelligent question that you don’t have an answer for, you resort to personal , thinly veiled, negative innuendoes. I mean what the hell does my husband’s attention to me or what I may be reading have to do with ANYTHING remotely related to this thread?
So YOU be a man, and realize how your comments have nothing to do with any kind of a responsible answer to my post….even if you disagree. Frankly, I could care less how many Harleys you ride or how many tattoos you currently are sporting.
Wrong according to your view,politics, and beliefs, but not wrong otherwise.
#35
RealVille, you have NO RIGHT to tell me my views, politics and beliefs are wrong. They are MINE and none of your business. Who do you think you are to place yourself in such a judgmental position? You may not agree with me, and that's fine, BUT this is MY opinion and I'm not asking for your qualification.

So, I'm done here. Not going to waste my 1,000th post on this nonsense.
#36
TheRealVille Wrote:Because if you were an honest man you would admit why you picked Bucky. It is derived from the word buck. Of course, you are not honest, and won't admit it. All you have to do is be a man, and admit how you came up with Bucky. If I come up with that name, you can bet I would be man enough to say it came from the word buck.
How about after Bucky Fuller and The Utopian Impulse
#37
TheRealVille Wrote:Because if you were an honest man you would admit why you picked Bucky. It is derived from the word buck. Of course, you are not honest, and won't admit it. All you have to do is be a man, and admit how you came up with Bucky. If I come up with that name, you can bet I would be man enough to say it came from the word buck.

Your silly retort should be under "Conspiracy". Now I could get mad at your accusations. However, I must consider the source. And, as I said earlier, you boys/girls see racism behind anything dealing with Kardashian. I would hope that others see it as amusing as do I.

You are a typical liberal. When in doubt, whine.
#38
Granny Bear Wrote:RealVille, you have NO RIGHT to tell me my views, politics and beliefs are wrong. They are MINE and none of your business. Who do you think you are to place yourself in such a judgmental position? You may not agree with me, and that's fine, BUT this is MY opinion and I'm not asking for your qualification.

So, I'm done here. Not going to waste my 1,000th post on this nonsense.

Don't waste your time. Although TheRealVille shows no respect for divine matters, he seems to claim a supernatural ability to real our minds. But, then, he is a typical liberal.
#39
Granny Bear Wrote:RealVille, you have NO RIGHT to tell me my views, politics and beliefs are wrong. They are MINE and none of your business. Who do you think you are to place yourself in such a judgmental position? You may not agree with me, and that's fine, BUT this is MY opinion and I'm not asking for your qualification.

So, I'm done here. Not going to waste my 1,000th post on this nonsense.
As are mine.
#40
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Your silly retort should be under "Conspiracy". Now I could get mad at your accusations. However, I must consider the source. And, as I said earlier, you boys/girls see racism behind anything dealing with Kardashian. I would hope that others see it as amusing as do I.

You are a typical liberal. When in doubt, whine.
Just be a man and tell how you came up with Bucky. Honesty is your friend. Be a man.
#41
TheRealVille Wrote:Just be a man and tell how you came up with Bucky. Honesty is your friend. Be a man.

Well, do you prefer the truth or what you want to be the truth? Bucky Kardashian seemed to fit better than Dinsmore Kardashian. If you want to spin it to suit your mindless prejudices, go for it. I certainly owe you no further explanation.
#42
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Well, do you prefer the truth or what you want to be the truth? Bucky Kardashian seemed to fit better than Dinsmore Kardashian. If you want to spin it to suit your mindless prejudices, go for it. I certainly owe you no further explanation.
Because you are afraid to admit that you are the racist that you are. Do you think that anybody with any brain can't figure that out? Be a man, not a *****, show your true convictions.
#43
TheRealVille Wrote:Because you are afraid to admit that you are the racist that you are. Do you think that anybody with any brain can't figure that out? Be a man, not a *****, show your true convictions.

Thank you, TheRealVille. Political correctness requires that all who find your president less than competent and a danger to the Republic are always deemed to be "racists". I have now been so pegged. In your eyes it is sure easier than trying to defend his bungling non-record of failures and excuses. Thus, you have pegged me with the others as one who sees through the media manure and sees your president as a unqualified fraud.

By calling your president "Bucky Kardashian" I am illustrating that he has earned his notariety just as has the Kardashian Family- by doing absolutely nothing. Of course, on the other hand, your president, unlike Kim and Chloe, has done something. He has managed, among other acts, to spend the country into near bankruptcy and to run his tours of apology worldwide thus weakening the standing of our country in the eyes of our friends and enemies. In another term, he could, quite possibly, destroy the capitalism upon which this country was built.

But, your ilk doesn't want to confront these facts so you resort to your standard cry of "racist". Therefore, to pacify you lemmings, I will take the liberty to grant a legal name change and change "Bucky Kardashian" to "Karl Kardashian". How is that?

Of course, it disregards such famous ***** League players as Hall of Famer, Buck Ewing, and ***** League great, Buck O'Neill but it is probably better because it suggests one of your president's favorite historic figures, Karl Marx.

Consequently, it shall be "Karl Kardashian". How does that grab you up there in Johnson County?
#44
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Thank you, TheRealVille. Political correctness requires that all who find your president less than competent and a danger to the Republic are always deemed to be "racists". I have now been so pegged. In your eyes it is sure easier than trying to defend his bungling non-record of failures and excuses. Thus, you have pegged me with the others as one who sees through the media manure and sees your president as a unqualified fraud.

By calling your president "Bucky Kardashian" I am illustrating that he has earned his notariety just as has the Kardashian Family- by doing absolutely nothing. Of course, on the other hand, your president, unlike Kim and Chloe, has done something. He has managed, among other acts, to spend the country into near bankruptcy and to run his tours of apology worldwide thus weakening the standing of our country in the eyes of our friends and enemies. In another term, he could, quite possibly, destroy the capitalism upon which this country was built.

But, your ilk doesn't want to confront these facts so you resort to your standard cry of "racist". Therefore, to pacify you lemmings, I will take the liberty to grant a legal name change and change "Bucky Kardashian" to "Karl Kardashian". How is that?

Of course, it disregards such famous ***** League players as Hall of Famer, Buck Ewing, and ***** League great, Buck O'Neill but it is probably better because it suggests one of your president's favorite historic figures, Karl Marx.

Consequently, it shall be "Karl Kardashian". How does that grab you up there in Johnson County?

How about:
Cracker Kardashian
Honkey Kardashian
Whitey Kardashian

Maybe if you use one of those TRV and Obama won't get their white asses in such a fizz.
#45
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Thank you, TheRealVille. Political correctness requires that all who find your president less than competent and a danger to the Republic are always deemed to be "racists". I have now been so pegged. In your eyes it is sure easier than trying to defend his bungling non-record of failures and excuses. Thus, you have pegged me with the others as one who sees through the media manure and sees your president as a unqualified fraud.

By calling your president "Bucky Kardashian" I am illustrating that he has earned his notariety just as has the Kardashian Family- by doing absolutely nothing. Of course, on the other hand, your president, unlike Kim and Chloe, has done something. He has managed, among other acts, to spend the country into near bankruptcy and to run his tours of apology worldwide thus weakening the standing of our country in the eyes of our friends and enemies. In another term, he could, quite possibly, destroy the capitalism upon which this country was built.

But, your ilk doesn't want to confront these facts so you resort to your standard cry of "racist". Therefore, to pacify you lemmings, I will take the liberty to grant a legal name change and change "Bucky Kardashian" to "Karl Kardashian". How is that?

Of course, it disregards such famous ***** League players as Hall of Famer, Buck Ewing, and ***** League great, Buck O'Neill but it is probably better because it suggests one of your president's favorite historic figures, Karl Marx.

Consequently, it shall be "Karl Kardashian". How does that grab you up there in Johnson County?
I like it. Karl provides a hint of Obama's Marxist policies and it is a manly sounding name lending a dose of masculinity that our girly-man president could really use (think Karl Malden, the big crooked-nosed tough-guy actor).
#46
Hey H.R. Vonner:

Mark Twain once said, " Don't argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." By the way, I kind of like Dinsmore. Karl is a much better fit.
#47
Hoot Gibson Wrote:I like it. Karl provides a hint of Obama's Marxist policies and it is a manly sounding name lending a dose of masculinity that our girly-man president could really use (think Karl Malden, the big crooked-nosed tough-guy actor).



Let's see, how does it go again? First they try laughing at you. If that doesn't work they will insult you. Then if all else fails, you get tagged. You will either be a right wing extremist, (which by the way, is the Pee Wee Herman, "I know you are but what am I" ploy, used in response by liberals being called out for their own ultra left wing extremism) or, the nuclear option is to be called a racist.:Thumbs:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#48
TheRealThing Wrote:Let's see, how does it go again? First they try laughing at you. If that doesn't work they will insult you. Then if all else fails, you get tagged. You will either be a right wing extremist, (which by the way, is the Pee Wee Herman, "I know you are but what am I" ploy, used in response to liberals being called out for their own ultra left wing extremism) or, the nuclear option is to be called a racist.:Thumbs:

TheRealThing hit the nail on the head. TheRealVille and his liberal whiners and apologists follow that script without without deviation. But, what else can they do? Karl Kardashian (sounds very fitting to me) cannot be intelligently defended.
#49
Harry Rex Vonner Wrote:Thank you, TheRealVille. Political correctness requires that all who find your president less than competent and a danger to the Republic are always deemed to be "racists". I have now been so pegged. In your eyes it is sure easier than trying to defend his bungling non-record of failures and excuses. Thus, you have pegged me with the others as one who sees through the media manure and sees your president as a unqualified fraud.

By calling your president "Bucky Kardashian" I am illustrating that he has earned his notariety just as has the Kardashian Family- by doing absolutely nothing. Of course, on the other hand, your president, unlike Kim and Chloe, has done something. He has managed, among other acts, to spend the country into near bankruptcy and to run his tours of apology worldwide thus weakening the standing of our country in the eyes of our friends and enemies. In another term, he could, quite possibly, destroy the capitalism upon which this country was built.

But, your ilk doesn't want to confront these facts so you resort to your standard cry of "racist". Therefore, to pacify you lemmings, I will take the liberty to grant a legal name change and change "Bucky Kardashian" to "Karl Kardashian". How is that?

Of course, it disregards such famous ***** League players as Hall of Famer, Buck Ewing, and ***** League great, Buck O'Neill but it is probably better because it suggests one of your president's favorite historic figures, Karl Marx.

Consequently, it shall be "Karl Kardashian". How does that grab you up there in Johnson County?

Uh, I feel an official disclaimer must be declared as this time regarding that statement. RV may live in Johnson Co. at this time , but he is not native to our county. He is an immigrant from Magoffin Co. that sought a better life.

Just wanted to set the record straight on that.:biggrin:
#50
Bob Seger Wrote:Uh, I feel an official disclaimer must be declared as this time regarding that statement. RV may live in Johnson Co. at this time , but he is not native to our county. He is an immigrant from Magoffin Co. that sought a better life.

Just wanted to set the record straight on that.:biggrin:
I didn't grant you the right to reveal anything about my identity. Actually, my family(both sides) is from Johnson, moved to Magoffin, and I came back to Johnson.
#51
TheRealVille Wrote:I didn't grant you the right to reveal anything about my identity. Actually, my family(both sides) is from Johnson, moved to Magoffin, and I came back to Johnson.

Didn't know I revealed anything. I am quite sure you have said you were from Magoffin on here before. If I am in error, my apologies. Anyways, I was just kidding.
#52
Bob Seger Wrote:Didn't know I revealed anything. I am quite sure you have said you were from Magoffin on here before. If I am in error, my apologies. Anyways, I was just kidding.
It's all good. I was kidding also. It's not like anybody that wants to know my identity on here doesn't already know. But, my grandparents, on both sides, were from Johnson. Oil Srings, on one side, Bristlebuck/Town on the other. My grandmother's house sat is in the same spot as present day PBH.
#53
Lately, I have heard from several sources that Karl Kardashian's main problem is that he has never signed the front of a paycheck. Now, that is a profound statement that says a lot about this novice that is sitting in the WH.
#54
Truth Wrote:Lately, I have heard from several sources that Karl Kardashian's main problem is that he has never signed the front of a paycheck. Now, that is a profound statement that says a lot about this novice that is sitting in the WH.
It is pretty revealing that he referred to his short stint working in the private sector as his time "behind enemy lines."
#56
Hoot Gibson Wrote:It is pretty revealing that he referred to his short stint working in the private sector as his time "behind enemy lines."



In earlier days such a statement would have created a firestorm of push back from the voting public. The media would have reported on it in accurate terms, exposing the true nature of the remark, and the chips would have already fallen. These days everything going out to the public is carefully measured and edited for a designed response. And that response is ALWAYS meant to be in support of the democrats and in opposition to the republicans. The so-called free media is not about to report the news at face value. It's a filtered version that makes it to the ear of the average American. Therefore, as a result, many Americans have become brainwashed to some degree. This kind of thing happens when a society begins to lose sight of the importance of truth and personal integrity.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#57
OK so can some of my comrades on the board explain this:
If it's true what the President meant to say that business and success couldn't be done without the help of government- why isn't everyone being successful? What separates a successful business from a failing one?
If we all went to similar schools, similar education, drive on the same roads and bridges, have available the same government programs and regulations, and surf the same net, in other words if all things are equal - why does one person succeed and the other one fails? Could it come down to the person? Someone with a drive to succeed, someone who works hard long hours, some one who puts in the blood, sweat, and tears it takes to build a business.

Just a thought on a Tuesday morning
#58
TheRealVille Wrote:Because you are afraid to admit that you are the racist that you are. Do you think that anybody with any brain can't figure that out? Be a man, not a *****, show your true convictions.

Obama is a joke I do not care what color he is. And face it, I have not ever heard the word buck used for a black guy, if we wanted to be racist we would call him something else.
#59
[quote=nky]OK so can some of my comrades on the board explain this:
If it's true what the President meant to say that business and success couldn't be done without the help of government- why isn't everyone being successful? What separates a successful business from a failing one?
If we all went to similar schools, similar education, drive on the same roads and bridges, have available the same government programs and regulations, and surf the same net, in other words if all things are equal - why does one person succeed and the other one fails? Could it come down to the person? Someone with a drive to succeed, someone who works hard long hours, some one who puts in the blood, sweat, and tears it takes to build a business.

Just a thought on a Tuesday morning[/Q. That is the way I was looking at it. If he was refering to everything the government does as making someone successful. Why isn't everyone successful. He was attacking the hard working people of this country and it has not been taken out of context.
#60
And you are right if he was referring to everything the government does as the cause of success why isn't everyone successful? He was attacking the hard working people of this country and nothing has been taken out of context.

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)