[thecavemaster]

Hillary Clinton would have been far more of a pragmatic president than 0bama - so, no the opposition to her policies would not have grown so strong, so quickly, as they have in opposition to 0bama's brand of socialism.

Pragmatic? As in status quo? As in don't worry about the healthcare system? As in let GM fail and the financial sector crash into ruin? As in don't worry about carbon footprints and continuing reliance upon foreign sources of energy? Obama is not a socialist, thus he has no "brand." He is a fair scales capitalist.