Thread Rating:
08-21-2010, 05:58 PM
thecavemaster Wrote:Wouldn't it be pretty for you, Hoot, if Glenn or Sean or Rush or Bill simply saying so actually made it so. I favor Governor Patterson's plan to sit everyone involved down and come up with an alternate location. However, in Constitutional principle, this multi-use facility (a prayer room included but not exactly a "mosque") cannot be prohibited. Your "any fool..." rhetoric is simpletonism in clear relief.I already said that the radical Islamists pushing for a Ground Zero mosque to open on 9/11/11 have the constitutional right to do so. If you want to continue to play the fool's role, then go right ahead - but stop mischaracterizing my posts.
Exercising a right and doing the right thing are two entirely different animals. Building a Ground Zero mosque is the wrong thing to do and most Americans have no trouble understanding why.
Messages In This Thread
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by thecavemaster - 08-20-2010, 03:11 PM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Amun-Ra - 08-21-2010, 03:26 AM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Hoot Gibson - 08-21-2010, 06:54 AM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Matman - 08-21-2010, 09:50 AM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by thecavemaster - 08-21-2010, 10:16 AM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Hoot Gibson - 08-21-2010, 11:44 AM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by thecavemaster - 08-21-2010, 04:40 PM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Hoot Gibson - 08-21-2010, 05:58 PM
In Bad Taste...but Constitutional - by Matman - 08-25-2010, 04:10 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)