[Hoot Gibson]

I find it amusing that millions of people voted for and support our current president who has repeatedly thumbed his nose at the US Constitution but who will nonetheless vote against a candidate who supports hypothetical changes to the Constitution with which they disagree.

It is far more important that our president respect the Constitution and to faithfully uphold laws passed in accordance with that document.

How do those of you who would oppose Rick Perry based on his opinion that the Constitution should be changed after two-thirds of the members of Congress vote to approve those changes, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states feel about Barack Obama continuing to violate the Constitution on a daily basis?

For openers, Obama is openly violating the War Powers Act by refusing to obtain the approval of Congress for the United States' participation in the war against Libya. Another example, but only one of many, is the Obama administration's refusal to cooperate in the investigation of Congress's investigation of the Fast and Furious gun running operation in which the administration facilitated the sale of weapons to a Mexican drug cartel that have been used in crimes that have resulted in dozens of deaths, including the killing of a US border agent.

If Perry couldn't get your vote because of his opinion on a hypothetical Constitutional amendment that will never become law, does that mean Obama earns your vote for behaving like a banana republic dictator and ignoring the Constitution?