[BOBCAT]

I completely agree that turnovers are part of the game. Whether caused by opposing team or out of own mistakes. When I played we were taught to cause turnovers. But, Belfry had turnovers also..they threw and interception and had to my memory two fumbles, but heads up playing recovering both. All but one of Breathitt's turnovers were caused by Belfry. Breathitt had 5 turnovers..the strip, muff punt, an interception and two fumbles which were from hard hits. Belfry also had 3 to 1 on personal foul pentalies. Two of those putting Breathitt in short fields, one setting up Breathitt on their last td. Belfry's D had held Breathitt to a 3rd and long if memory serves an a late hit which was questionable gave them first and 10 right inside the 15 I believe. After factoring all of that how can you all say that Breathitt was "just as good if not better than Belfry" Maybe Breathitt had not played a Defense like they had against Belfry. Breathitt has a good football team, no doubt. But "better than Belfry" they are not. Why is it so hard for Breathitt fans to admit that?

Well I said the game was over but you insist in idiotic rants.Here you go then.4th and 1 Breathitt stops you but "your" ref sees the stop and just happens to call dead ball false start on Belfry and just let's you have the down back and another try at it when we just held.You fumble;we recover the ball and slide out with it and the line judge says blue ball but the same ref overrules him from the other side of the field?WOW.So just shut up already and look to Garrard.We were very even.Both would have destroyed Garrard and both would have lost to Central.Only difference is you will lose to them we are already done and looking to next year.We WILL see you next year too.