[Stardust]

I will use your logic to debate this question. Since HC was blown out by BW earlier in the season, and NCC played very close with BW when they played, shouldnt NCC have blown out HC as well? BW beat NCC without Hightchew in the second half as well. Statistically, HC dominated the second meeting. Anyone at the game will tell you HC dominated that matchup. The BW game taught HC where they were weak and they fixed it and it showed leaps and bounds. Anyone that knows football would agree that BW would not beat HC like they did at the beginning of the season, if at all. NCC beating the rest of the teams on their schedule is a testament to them being a good football team, but at the end of the year, HC would beat those same teams imo.

So let's go back to your statement. You said that NCC was not the better team all year, thus you are insinuating that HC was? That can't be possible if HC lost to NCC earlier in the year. So, with the other body of work, I think NCC fans can argue they were the better team until at least the 10/22 game. After that, the best team in 2A may have changed, but it's awfully hard to argue that HC was the best 2A team all year. At the end of the year, when it counted, yes. But how can you say all year, which is what the argument was in the first place by Birdman, which you disputed?

LOL, I'm not knocking HC. I thought HC would beat NCC in October, but the game was a 17 point margin, which changed not only mine, but a lot of peoples opinions. HC changed that in November, winning by 3.

I used Beechwood as a comparable game, which indicates to me, that when each team played Beechwood, NCC's performance was better than HC's, thus it adds to my thought that during the season, until at least 10/22, NCC was the better 2A team.

Keep the debate to what the original comment was and I have yet to be convinced that HC was the best team in 2A the entire season.