[Truth]

Makes zero sense to what I was saying.

You claim that Zimmerman "initiated" the contact. Since we don't know for sure who "attacked" whom yet, you must be saying that Zimmerman "initiated" the contact by getting out of his car and approaching Martin and, therefore, should be "convicted of something". Following that logic, can't we say that if the Chicago demonstrators had stayed in their homeless shelters or under their bridges, or at the unemployment office, or whatever and had not provoked the confrontation with the police, there would have been no "contact"? Thus, the demonstrators initiated the "contact" and should all be convicted of something.

And, isn't it interesting that, now that a few facts are coming out and the spin of the liberal media and some of those strange looking Democrat congresswomen is being contradicted, a current Rasmussen poll shows that 40% believe Zimmerman acted in self-defense and 24% still believe it was murder. Although polls won't deliver the verdict, let's hope that political correctness doesn't do so either.