[Poseidon]

A few friends and I had this discussion the other day. Do you think that the best coaches should be measured by # of wins, or # of championships? Someone was trying to make an argument to put Bob Schneider ahead of Mueller, Beatty, and even Mike Glaser of St. X. It sounds to me that the best way to measure a coach on the field is by the number of championships produced. Obviously, Mueller, Beatty, and Glaser are well superior to Schneider, Haywood, and Hilton.

For the general fan, which is the majority, wins are the only thing that matters. For people who look past wins\losses and know the difference that the coach is making in players lives, which is the minority, wins\losses are less important. But everyone wants a team that is competitive whether they win or not.