[Panther Thunder]

Then that is part of the problem.

No matter if your a Belfry or Pikeville fan, that is not conducive to good match-ups.

Belfry is a top 20 program right and and should be playing top 20 competition in the PCB.

Pikeville, unfortunately is not.

You get a competitive game for each of them one year, then your getting 2 blowouts the next.

No doubt. Without the ability for one year contracts, this strategy will produce two likely blowouts and two likely good games every two years. But, I will say that the current strategy is light years better than the ideas being slung around by the committee now.

Best idea I have heard yet is pairing up with another bowl similar to the PCB and letting The two big schools trade opponents and the two smaller schools trade opponents. It would make scheduling even harder, but that is the best idea I have seen yet.