[jumper1]

I don't think there is enough of a sample size to declare that the offense will be fixed by changing quarterbacks. I know that the backup provided a spark off of the bench Friday and looked pretty good in limited action in other games. However, I'd like to make a couple of points. Friday's game is really the only one in which he had to take any snaps with a lot of game pressure on him. Most of the other ones have come in mop up duty. Secondly, LCA most likely didn't have any game film of him going against other starting defenses and hadn't gameplanned for him. That will change as teams get to look at him and the Somerset offense with him at quarterback. They will be more prepared for the looks that he gives them.

All of your points are very true, however I think that LCA showed future teams how to stop the Jumpers. Control the line of scrimmage, put 10 in the box and see if Gadberry can beat you. Last Friday night IMO Somerset wouldn't have won if not for Hatcher. I agree that LCA probably wasn't prepared for Hatcher and if so would've been much more prepared. What Hatcher prevents is a quality team being able to lay back and fill the box. His time against LCA was no doubt full of pressure with the team being down and home field advantage on the line. Hatcher will be able to spread the field more and give the RB's more of an opportunity to run.