[TheRealThing]

He didn't catch Obama in a lie, and Candy didn't misspeak. In the rose garden the next day Obama did in fact say,

I put a link that most of you won't doubt, btw. Candy was acknowledging that Obama did say that "no acts of terror" in the speech the next day, and also acknowledging that Romney was also right, in that it took 2 weeks to call it an "organized" act of terror. Does it really matter, in the scheme of things, when it was officially called an organized act of terror? It takes time to find out facts. Why is Romney politicizing something that even Chris's dad doesn't want used as a political "talking point"? Some things need to be looked at without red, or blue, glasses, and see it for how it is.

Oh it was politicized by the Obama admin alright, and from the very first official comments that were made. The story was, according to Hillary and UN Ambassador Susan Rice, "the violence was the reaction to an anti-Islamic video posted on the internet". Susan Rice went on to catagorically deny any possibility that the attacks 9/11 were planned or had anything to do with 9/11, LOL. :please: Hillary and Jay Carney later confirmed their complete support of the Susan Rice statement which aired on 5 different Sunday news shows. Fifteen days after Chris Stevens lay dead, Obama appeared at the United Nations and repeated the cover story in his speech, mentioning the video as being responsible for the "spontaneous violence" 6 times. Only the dizziest of spinners would try to say this administration called the actions taken on our embassy an act of terror until 14 days had ticked by. These matters are a matter of public record.

And speaking of which, on to your post. When Obama said--- "Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.
But there is absolutely no justification for this type of senseless violence. None." He was making an obvious reference to the infamous video. Now, you're telling me he knew innediately about the video that now even he admits couldn't have had the first thing to do with the benghazi attack, but he didn't know about Ambassador Stevens letters and oft requests for beefed up security?

In his generic remarks in which he defines what it means to be an American, he later said this--- "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation," that, along with other statements. He never said the Benghazi attack was an act of terror until 14 days later and then it was Jay Carney who actually said that during an prepared statement to the press. I didn't hear Obama address the matter outside of the video context until Joy Behar asked him why the official White House position was different from the position of Secretary of State Clinton, when he danced all around it yet again----Real Clear Politics Quote; Nevertheless, President Obama, when asked by Joy Behar whether the attack was a terrorist act, replied that it “wasn’t just a mob action.” He would not call it terrorism. LINK--- http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article...15599.html

Anybody not biased for this administration in view of the soon coming election day, can see right through the smoke screen.