[TheRealVille]

Like I said, you don't understand the fight that transpired and the process that generated the world's finest craftsmen. I heard this very same argument in Texas in the early to mid 70's. BA's and union officials, stewards, heck, everybody said that going 'right to work' would totally kill the union. Well, Brown and Root came and sort of went. And unions contiued to flourish and are still the roosters of their field. Union's life blood isn't contracts and political alliances that prohibit right to work laws, it's their level of expertise, and ability to produce the best product.

It amazes me to listen to you go on and on about what you think is important. Where change applies to matters dealing with social justice, you're all about it, bring on the gay and lesbian rights legislation and bring on ObamaCare, give everything to everybody in the form of government entitlements, women should be able to choose what to do with their own bodies, even murder their babies for the sake of convenience, and with government funding, which means I have to help pay for these hellish acts of slaughter. But, you're not about to take any backwater when it comes to any changes on the labor scene. That's where you stand firm in drawing a line in the sand. You can't have it both ways, that's the nature of the fight that I think you have yet to rise to a level of understanding on, though you do participate. Conservatives resist this idea of wholesale liberal change just to please those who are not disciplined enough to live by our society's long accepted standards of work and morality. Liberals want to keep adding more and more pollutants to the recipie until it is no longer recogizable, while calling those who offer wise council small minded and passe.

Do you think unions can flourish in right to work states?