[Hoot Gibson]

They aren't shoving views, they are just allowing the ones that want an abortion to get one, since the supreme court said it is legal.

Yes, Democrats impose their views on Americans to a far greater extent than Republicans. Abortion advocates push for legislation like Obamacare, which not only dictate how Americans spend their own money, also require employers to provide services to employees that violate their own religious beliefs.

Which btw, was lopsided with republican appointed justices, which I'm sure you have read here before. Democrats don't make, or not make anybody get an abortion, they just want to allow it because it's legal.

Those who oppose abortion do so on the basis that unborn children are humans who cannot speak for themselves. The do not see abortion as a victimless crime. There is no moral difference in not making people get abortions and forcing them to pay for somebody else's abortion.

You don't see the differeance in allowing people to make their own life choices, and people like you that want to make rules that make those choices for people? Democrats let you do your thing, or not, in their tolerance. Your kind don't think people should be able to make their own choices, you want to make laws that keep people from making their own choices.

What right is more fundamental than the right of people to spend the money that they earn on what they choose? It is not enough for Democrats to have everybody pay the same share of their earnings on federal income taxes, they seek to maximize the number of Democratic voters who pay no taxes while forcing those earning more to pay virtually all federal income taxes. What is tolerant about trying to stick successful people with the cell phone bills of those too lazy to work?

Your people don't want to allow people to smoke weed in the privacy of their home. Yes, you try to legislate morality. If you don't want to smoke, fine, but what gives you the right to tell others that they can't?

Do you support higher taxes on cigarettes to discourage people from smoking? Do you support laws that prohibit people from smoking in restaurants or forcing owners to designate non-smoking areas? What about seat belt laws? Zoning laws? How about campaign finance laws, which limit the amount of money that an individual can donate to a candidate whose views he supports? Should the government have the authority to restrict the guns that a person can purchase for self defense?

What about the freedom of people and businesses to freely enter into contracts with other individuals and companies? How can you oppose right to work laws and claim that Republicans are the party that seeks to control personal behavior? What is more fundamental than a person's right to work for anybody willing to hire them to do so?

You are very selective about which laws you oppose on the basis that they infringe on individual freedom. Democrats are responsible for far more, and far more reaching laws and regulations that deprive individuals of basic human rights than Republicans are - and Republicans have been the source of too many laws and regulations themselves.

Virtually all of the reasons for supporting the legalization of drug use for adults apply to the repeal of thousands of laws and regulations championed by liberal do-gooders who get off on depriving the rest of us of basic human rights in the name of the state.