[TheRealVille]

I was simply posting published research that stated the negative effects of pot as it was stated that there wasn't any. These may be links, but they are to actual research papers that have been published. Just as there are research papers that state the medical benefits of pot. If it is stated that these are not worthy, than research papers that support the positives of pot should be deemed not worthy as well.

Take a poll of 100 people (who support legalizing marijuana).....ask them two questions....(1) would you drink and drive....(2) would you drive after/during smoking a joint.....I guarantee you that for #1 99.9% would say NO and for #2 99.9% would say YES because they think and have been told that it doesn't have any negative effects when research shows differently. Thus leading to my concerns that you will never know whether Tom, Dick, or Harry is high when driving a school bus, fixing my pizza, or simply driving to work.

If they would drive drunk, they would drive high. Most that wouldn't drive drunk, won't drive high. You will always have a few bad eggs out there, but the rule of thumb stands. Your figure would be way off. You should know you can't guess at facts. The uninformed are the reason that all these so called "facts" are floating around out there.