[TheRealVille]

LOL, yeah well, at least I was smart enough to understand Run's question. He pointed out that the case you posted dealt primarily with the question of race, not marriage. I can also grasp the basic principle role of the supreme court, "in this respect its role parallels that of the state courts of final resort in making the decisive interpretation of state law." In other words the SCOTUS parallels state courts to interpret state law. Never has the Supreme Court made a ruling that marriage is a right. The states do that.


FWIW, they made a superintendent out of me.

Yea? I've worked for several idiots that knew somebody, or kissed a lot of butt, and got a superintendent position. :biggrin: