Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Death Doc Kermit Gosnell's Silent Co-Conspirators
#12
TheRealVille Wrote:^ On his no votes, it was always inline with the medical definition of viable. If they word it to where it doesn't goes against RvW(supreme court ruling), he is for it. This has been explained time and again. A baby born before 22 weeks cannot live outside the womb, and that's how his vote always went. If it is on the living side of where a baby can live outside the womb, he is for protecting their rights.
If a baby is born alive and breathing, it is not a fetus, it is an American citizens with all of the rights that the U.S. Constitution grants to the rest of us. Infanticide is not a form of abortion, and viability has nothing to do with the definition of a human being that exits the birth canal alive. Obama was wrong then and you are wrong now if you believe otherwise. Seriously wrong.
Messages In This Thread
Death Doc Kermit Gosnell's Silent Co-Conspirators - by Hoot Gibson - 04-20-2013, 01:11 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)