[Patch]

I was thinking about that... but at the same time there is a bit of a slippery slope there as well.

Of course you have to allow sons of coaches to follow their dads, especially if relocation is involved.

BUT... where the slippery slope comes into play would be with the term "legal guardian". In recruit heavy states there have been several instances of a legal guardian, or handler, who suddenly gets a nice coaching position and the kid they are taking in then transfers with them.

You are so correct and bring up a great point. We have a local school here who is doing quite well the past several years in football and from what I understand one person has been a "legal guardian" to more than a few of the transfers. This is something that needs to be looked into. If the kids are moving to a town legit, that is one thing, but if they are just being signed over to someone so they can play football there, that is not right at all. But just my opinion, maybe I am looking at it wrong.