[EKUAlum05]

Again, a diversionary tactic to change the topic. I like you EKU, but I am yet to see a point as to why Haywood is better than Mueller, Beatty, Skroggins, or all but one or two of the coaches on the regional list that he is in the running for. I am talking about the coaches that are on this list. Regardless of the situation, class you are in, etc., 12 state titles are 12 state titles, as the first coach on the list has done (8 in private, 4 in public).

Since you mentioned it, however...

1. Mueller and Beatty - both have made the most of their situations and have won a ton of state titles. I'm not going through the headache of trying to pick who is better.

2. Ty Skroggins - A coach who has won multiple state titles as Central, some years (especially 2007) his team has won as the underdog.

3. Eviston...I know very little about him, how many state titles does he have?

Again, I am yet to see a point as to how Haywood is the best coach on this regional list.

You mistake me for someone claiming Haywood is the best coach in the state...I am not. In fact my opinion of a Coach Ranking might surprise you.

I am pointing out that based on your previous posts in this thread about who you are voting for an what qualifies them as the best coach it is above all else, and unequivocally, Championship Frequency in your opinion. Moreso than Championship Total.. moreso than competition level... and void of quality of team (because the St. X coach would dominate everyone on that list).


Scroggins and Beatty each have won Championships in 71.4% of the seasons they have coached.

Eviston has won Championships in 66% of the seasons he has coached.

Mueller has won championships in 55% of the seasons he has coached.

So either there is more that goes into being the best coach rather than Championship Frequency... or...well.... your boy Dale Mueller is second tier to a NewCath coach