[TNT-MB1]

Nah, I'm sorry to say, houliston would not have been at QB if kuntz was there. But your right, these are all "ifs".

I don't know if I agree with more talent now than that 2010 team. I think, you blame that on coaching that Ryle didn't win state in 2010. That 2010 team was loaded.

As good as SK was last season, I still think HHS would have beat them.

No way in hell SK has a QB coming up that will be as good as kuntz was. No way. I'm telling you right now, outside of barker and sindlear from Caldwell, kuntz would have been the starting QB for any team in the state.

Coaching was the reason they lost to Trinity. The Rocks came in and played stop the run D all night because they knew the Raiders hadn't passed enough to rely on there passing offense to win a big game. They effectively shut down the rushing of Elliott, Mullens and Hempel. This forced Hempel to throw more than run. Warner's offense failed in this game. It was still a close and good game.

Not to take anything away from Hempel becuase he could chuck the rock. But there is 10 other players that weren't familiar with throwing the ball 20+ times a game.

And it's athletic potential not just talent. That group in 2010 was special and was the best group to go they Ryle to this point but these upcoming sophmore and junior groups remind me of 2010