[PHSForever]

Hazard was originally in the district before Pikeville and Phelps complained. So now that hazard wins the appeal they are the cry babies because they wanted to keep the original lay out..

Phelps had a legitimate complaint based on travel time. Now, to lay it out for people here, a compilation of responses to the survey of schools on the proposed alignments was put together. It appears all schools were given a chance to voice if they agreed to the alignments or not. It appears Hazard chose not to respond yes or no. Phelps responded not in favor primarily due to travel. The Pikeville response was "no, not a fan of 5 team districts and who drafted the proposed alignment?" That was the extent of the "complaint" that I can find. I do not find any more lengthy opposition to the proposal that first had Hazard in the same district. Not exactly crying about it, but I DO wish the person who had responded had been a bit more professional and detailed in their opposition, but it is what it is. If there is a more detailed opposition, I'd certainly like to read it.