[TheRealThing]

Very true.
But lets not sugar coat it. People and money came from everywhere to elect a black president. You would be hard pressed to find any celebrity or athlete in 2008 who would say Obama was shit because of fear of being labeled a racist and dismissed among inner circles. I look at it this way. That garbage is over now. I agree we need someone further to the right than more centered, and it needs to be someone who stands firm on all important issues.
It seems candidates think running to the center will help them gain votes, when, as weve seen time and time again, you get your own party out more the further you run to the right.
Liberal democrats tried to play the center in November and it killed them.

That's a good point. What we're seeing, is no spat between classic Dems and Republicans. The answer to why Dems are so driven to dominate the political scene that they are willing to play a high stakes game with the fate of 'the people,' is at it's root, ideological. The modern day liberal movement has it's fanatics to be sure. And, they have gotten support from factions of society through charges of racism, (which affords them very convenient moral 'cover,' for not working out their own fortunes in the land of equal opportunity) that, and the promise of social reparations via the federal government. The system is trying to correct itself through the election process but, as Hoot mentions, elitists think they know better. None the less, we have a Republican controlled Congress again so, even though they're (libs) among the Republicans to a much lesser degree, we'll see.

Liberals are finding their way into government as well as the news media. As I have mentioned, the one two punch of federal overreach and the worshipful main stream media, drone out the liberal message 24/7. That and the liberally laced academia, make the indoctrination nearly airtight, as they have achieved the perfect platforms from which to both preach and initiate the tenets of their religion. And despite a very carefully preserved and concise record, they've got a potent, though superficial age-old tool to use in the destruction of the conservative argument. That is to use deriding rhetoric to declare conservatives old fashion or just plain stupid. The perfect example of how well the tactic works was played out in grand scale during the second Presidential debate between Romney and Obama. When Candice, in a transgression of debate rules, validated Obama's absurdly weak assertion that he'd called the Benghazi attack terrorism. The two of them teaming up, and with no means other than his memory to refute them, Romney was taken completely off stride. The shame of it other than the fact that he was right, is that people of integrity are never ready for that kind of deceit, especially deceit on the global scale.

No society is ever more than a generation away from decline, owing to the fact that each successive generation must be taught the rules on which their society have been founded, and an undistorted picture of their own national heritage. Needless to say, America has failed on epic scale to adequately convey those truths, and we're now allowing the indoctrination of our second in succession generational failure. Students across this land are being taught a boat load of lies. America is surely the salt that has preserved the well being of mankind in general, but, they're being taught that our greed caused the wars we sacrificed so much in order to win. Likewise, the noble aspirations of our own founding fathers have been skewed so far left I'm surprised NASCAR hasn't assigned them all numbers.

But specifically to your point that I have bolded. The drumbeat propagandist line that we keep hearing, is that liberalism is a rising juggernaut that is supported by a majority of the people. Which obviously, as the midterms of 2014 have amply demonstrated, is patently false. :biggrin: