[Hoot Gibson]

Some Democrats may desert her but the media won't. And, remember, those who depend on the media, including the internet, for their news are borderline in intelligence.

Of course, Warren would be our first self-proclaimed redskin candidate. Maybe she could return the $24.00 in beads, etc. and recapture Manhattan for the members of her tribe.

I think that the media is already beginning to turn on Clinton. When MSNBC's Larry O'Donnell dares to criticize a Democrat, you know that there are many others in the media who quietly wish for a different Democratic front runner.

The media wants to see a liberal Democrat in the White House. The media is so liberal, many view Hillary Clinton as a moderate - or even a conservative, as unbelievable as that seems to real conservatives.

Hillary Clinton is not a particularly bright woman. If she had not married a talented, though a scumbag, politician, Hillary would have been hard pressed to have won a state wide office.

Elizabeth Warren made some big blunders during her campaign, but she was smart enough to be elected on her own merit. Alan Dershowitz is on record as saying that Warren was one of the brightest students that he has ever taught. He says the same thing about Ted Cruz. I have no doubt that Warren would is more liberal, more honest, and more intelligent than Hillary.

If Warren decides that she would have a shot at winning the nomination and the presidency and publicly announces an interest in the office, liberal support for Hillary in the media will begin to fade quickly.